Re: linux_4.6-1~exp2_multi.changes REJECTED

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 16:26 +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>>
>> Processing raised an exception: mipsr6 is not a valid architecture name or wildcard.
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 968, in check
>>     final_suites = self._final_suites()
>>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 857, in _final_suites
>>     if self._check_new(suite, overridesuite):
>>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 822, in _check_new
>>     if self._check_new_binary_overrides(suite, overridesuite):
>>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 786, in _check_new_binary_overrides
>>     packages = source.package_list.packages_for_suite(suite)
>>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/packagelist.py", line 128, in packages_for_suite
>>     built = entry.built_in_suite(suite)
>>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/packagelist.py", line 58, in built_in_suite
>>     built_on_arch = self.built_on_architecture(arch.arch_string)
>>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/packagelist.py", line 49, in built_on_architecture
>>     if match_architecture(architecture, arch):
>>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/architecture.py", line 94, in match_architecture
>>     raise InvalidArchitecture('{0} is not a valid architecture name or wildcard'.format(wildcard))
>> InvalidArchitecture: mipsr6 is not a valid architecture name or wildcard

I'd guess that the `dpkg' should upgrade on dak machine?

>
> OK, what's the story here?  This had better get fixed quickly,
> otherwise I'm going to have to revert the package changes.
>
> Ben.
>
> --
> Ben Hutchings
> Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer