Re: mips64el in testing

Niels Thykier <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:27:06 +0000

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips,gmane.linux.debian.devel.release
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Aurelien Jarno:
> [...]
> 
> Here is the current buildd lists and how there are configured:
> - eberlin (DSAed): mipsel then mips64el
> - mipsel-aql-01 (DSAed): mipsel then mips64el
> - mipsel-aql-02 (DSAed): mipsel then mips64el
> - mipsel-aql-03 (DSAed): mips64el then mipsel
> - mipsel-manda-01 (DSAed): mipsel then mips64el
> - mipsel-manda-01 (DSAed): mipsel then mips64el
> - clash (manually signed): mips64el
> - lm6100 (manually signed): mips64el
> - thor (manually signed): mips64el
> 

Thanks.  I have updated our lists.  For now I am only counting a buildd
on its primary arch.

> In short only one DSAed buildd builds mips64el before mipsel. This is
> clearly not enough for the port.
> 

Indeed, though it looks solvable. :)  Anyway, it has been added as an RM
concern for now.

Let me know if there are updates to their primary architectures.

>> to be shared between mipsel and mips64el.  Are some of these being
>> migrated to/replaced with DSA buildds?
> 
> 2 buildds have arrived at man-da and 2 at sil. They need to be racked
> and installed. They will be split between mips (they have an FPU) and
> mipsel/mips64el, likely 1 mips and 1 mipsel in each location, but it's
> not fully decided yet.
> 
> Aurelien
> 

Sounds great. :)

Thanks,
~Niels

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 801 B)