Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

Niels Thykier <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips
Message-ID <5f4474be-626c-7e11-e1ef-afd69270d3d5__46857.4957958937$1465846548$gmane$org@thykier.net>
Philipp Kern:
> On 2016-06-05 12:01, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>  * amd64, i386, armel, armhf, arm64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el,
>>    s390x
>>    - *No* blockers at this time from RT, DSA nor security.
>>    - s390, ppc64el and all arm ports have DSA concerns.
> 
> What is the current DSA concern about s390x?
> 
> Kind regards and thanks
> Philipp Kern
> 

The concern listed as: "rely on sponsors for hardware (mild concern)"

As I recall the argument went something along the lines of:

"Debian cannot replace the hardware; if any of the machines dies, we
need a sponsor to replace it.  If all of them dies and we cannot get
sponsored replacements, we cannot support the architecture any longer"

(My wording)

Thanks,
~Niels
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 801 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=nb4G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.