Re: binutils on mips*
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips,gmane.linux.debian.kde.talk,gmane.linux.debian.devel.release |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7980300.tHfumtsaNb@tonks> |
On lunes, 9 de enero de 2017 14:19:44 ART Julien Cristau wrote: [snip] > Either convince Matthias to apply a fix to Debian's binutils package, or > NMU it. I've tried it and none of them worked so far. What's next then? TC? I would really not want to go that way, and considering the time it takes the TC to have a ruling we will be already working on buster. Is there anything else one can do here? -- Theory and practice sometimes clash. And when that happens, theory loses. Every single time. Linus Benedict Torvalds. Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEEt36hKwjsrvwSzE8q2RfQGKGp9AFAlhzpPEACgkQq2RfQGKG p9Cp9A//Z8+naF2lz0Gccl4GcGvsoeW8Jo9GIAuHSqbbPE7b4NCl1IUpF3hk7CNZ xmXpm5Th3yRcyd9XvUyBB9g8I6mDC5iduWPmikmW+bdYEAGUakqnnuTN7XB4xEWx nLGZbVQRq+VixPZAvoRYiKi8iGuBDHfSsX/Q/m386UzB/9qj7LjC/GrtJdEFs+5T QG7tMiHya+6wvXFhNvzITlI0g/unT8ikHJi1Y+MFHUF5o9/mkOWGvdMOaA8nSrxk nlkJFTS3LtAuNtSqeuuI4EFGq/b1vokuBVPCbeCXAnKfwpcugCKgi//64tbeenRk UChZ6fyCklYmFD/dWtLEUrXGYpYnbdc4IiCYK6VxLVropjRn50opzVrhKpNkHsKQ xYZkTftqqu9hTDIvshqF09EvwMnrOtwvRzLFl4nmiP8HETYVSx7ARfa/Z0+tqANF T1qO9S7fQDkFVYQqjVeZELZdRF5wNFicQjGRBKlvrSunLGF3/0Ch5e75jYgHyzhy wM52h4J+CEEgjwOsprA7olD5paCHh6HF8F9qch9OjQeUB82HuCjqLApu5TlavyUz nI5poaVEG5lTPoASJ7x7WPbuwiXfZot90PxFOy3N9tjJ/1jZxrz5doCq1bAwBBP0 w6rS+Cxf8B4hqgh9g7PfeGrtk90jyWOEE7JoEHaMzqtejdm+KNA= =NfUR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----