Re: Do we know the last binutils version it used to work?

On domingo, 8 de enero de 2017 23:40:00 ART Matthias Klose wrote:
> The
> binutils update plan was announced last June [1], and I plan to stick to
> it.
> 
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/06/msg00007.html

The binutils update plan says:

  Expecting binutils 2.27 (or maybe binutils 2.28) for stretch. binutils 2.27
  will be uploaded to unstable after the GCC defaults change.

We had binutils 2.27 which did not cause the issue and no technical reason why 
we *need* 2.28. Would you mind stating it?

-- 
Combata las características. Si una característica no es absolutamente
esencial, descártela, especialmente si tiene el mismo efecto que se
puede alcanzar mediante la combinación de otras características.
  Andrew S. Tanenbaum, de su libro "Computer Networks"

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/

-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=epHa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----