Re: Bug#850887: Decide proper solution for binutils' mips* bug

Julien Cristau <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips,gmane.linux.debian.devel.release
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 16:56:05 -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:

> 
> Hi.
> I'd really appreciate comments from debian-release on this issue.
> Would debian-release like us to take this up?
> If so, I have a proposal for how to fast-track this situation, but I am
> only comfortable doing that if the release team is involved.
> 
Hi Sam,

I was actually about to involve the TC (from a release management
perspective) when Lisandro did.

Here's a timeline I think summarizes events ttbomk:
- on 31 October 2016, the release team finalized the list of release
  architectures for stretch, including mips, mipsel and mips64el
- on 2 November 2016, the binutils maintainer switch from the upstream
  2.27 branch to upstream trunk, which caused a number of regressions
- on 5 November 2016 was the transition freeze for stretch, which is
  intended to reduce the amount of churn affecting many packages at once
- one of the regressions is still unfixed to this day, and blocks a
  number of package migrations to testing, including library transitions
  and RC bug fixes, to the point that if it doesn't get fixed in the
  next few days the options are to either delay the stretch freeze
  (planned for 5 February) or drop three architectures from stretch; I
  feel like a freeze delay might end up being necessary due to this bug
  anyway, even if it does get fixed now
- early this week Lisandro finally NMUed with a patch for this bug, only
  to be promptly reverted by the maintainer

I think it's way past time we fixed this, to avoid any further harm to
the stretch release.  That may mean reverting to the 2.27 branch,
reverting specific changes from our 2.28 branch snapshot, or applying a
proposed fix ahead of upstream, I'm not picky about specifics.  Help
from the TC in getting to a quick resolution would be very much welcome.

Thanks,
Julien
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=mddS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.