Re: Bug#850887: Decide proper solution for binutils' mips* bug
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.release,gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2211216.49WCn41XZq@tonks> |
I would like to point out that it would be preferable if, in case a patch is preferable over going back to the last know version to work, either Matthias or a mips porter points out which of the two proposed patches is preferable. For the time being I'm testing the patch I submited to the bug, but I have no preference over any of them (nor technical grounds to discuss). Thanks, Lisandro. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEEt36hKwjsrvwSzE8q2RfQGKGp9AFAlh3mJ8ACgkQq2RfQGKG p9BN3Q//dCpd2CGVCz/FZ98jSAOlWCZDP547tPo3Cto0jwKua7nCBdWvD3XMmwAi VB77v39c7TgqyIy7ZFlCI3oGOUaFkbshddw0X2i47bJKx7h132o4JHWwiXPoN434 7wue08kpC+QdwbUnOtuzuOltkaN/PVRpO1kTFHZEnNhsIM2xs4/8OIqpEObBDtia gC2jHkqPVSEY9OoK2Oob/n0x/lodhNX3m6s5SR5XPcCNuo12xNhbcAJ4dQri3EUK MX1uBdGvkOzfPMp9jo6zV1ALJk+I56QzWeux2Z3eotyUbGF9HbqE4xVzkBrm1lwM DzOOhOHA0tywkP0hH006xmJrW7CQ8qjBCnkHoE+36KuqhsGe+K9rHVzACdG1yBhV lyUNBigAakqI1C38T+65oFO3aXfnTKizVdwtjErb7wVIrWbz+OG00jbJlmTjskhg Xzp+ZMQpJ6zvHnQZ5+b9w/Whe6SAdxHCfI3uWM3eay/bbn4w5A9dr6ShS+U8JAPl /G/S7Tl6mO3dgv032bcYm3/jawjqEiTVrF0i8LcIfAPQQRd7puzhfsBpAqgdUrhK Bo46/BQXitQtzoYmrINUaxASt3CK5JH9CuSLR3sIeDPIY4q/TOFeXFIRWfu1NfwZ H3lk7XOLAOR0c/ml888ujOuFKkTeekZpnkbuKTPXv+yx58gSsek= =kAt/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----