Re: Bug#1086128: src:sbcl: fails to migrate to testing for too long

Sean Whitton <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.powerpc,gmane.linux.debian.devel.release
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
Hello,

On Sat 21 Dec 2024 at 03:34pm +01, Paul Gevers wrote:

> How severe do you think this error is? Does it indicate that sbcl is
> useless on ppc64el or is this a niche use case?

I would doubt that it means that sbcl is useless on ppc64el because of
how upstream can't reproduce the problem.

> Removal of sbcl on ppc64el seems to be going to be non-trivial as it's a key
> package via cl-cffi which is needed for brltty which is very important for our
> accessibility support (pulled in via d-i if I'm not mistaken).

An alternative would just be to downgrade sbcl with a +really version.

-- 
Sean Whitton
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 869 B) 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Pm1f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.