Re: Bug#1086128: src:sbcl: fails to migrate to testing for too long

Hi,

On 22-12-2024 02:46, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Sat 21 Dec 2024 at 03:34pm +01, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> How severe do you think this error is? Does it indicate that sbcl is
>> useless on ppc64el or is this a niche use case?
> 
> I would doubt that it means that sbcl is useless on ppc64el because of
> how upstream can't reproduce the problem.

Ack. Let's give the porters a few more days, and otherwise accept the 
regression of cl-ironclad and cl-postmodern on ppc64el.

My offer of access to a testbed on the ci.d.n infrastucture still stands.

Paul

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

wsB5BAABCAAjFiEEWLZtSHNr6TsFLeZynFyZ6wW9dQoFAmdnzd8FAwAAAAAACgkQnFyZ6wW9dQq+
mwf/ZDztoB9ky2bZdy5XhFF+aQ2rO8C8pkThs08W6XocGffrJU2slowTmbfiAtSMoxDjSycaAOCz
vd99DkQ97KPjxClcuklIq8R5au+o/fnPoWlXn0ASqis/dLcoesSOUtYwe2hR6wBIJir5wDZ7i1p+
Qqj3Zc8rT2eXfwcOPXW+AlA41OpBqZ81+cDFkwQz0OjWFB1KJIfyKK6gSkJg50cC2zk8OQ+GLrZT
F/Yaq/qWE8nMdKU8QDA1e2RJ/bNlECCsqcgjLWPoDnsS5tECKouydAWFAhzv3eV7GUGe2h50CMfC
okNlc28i2e5I2lyou+3ZdBl/QlEk2Ke6I9cRmc7I5w==
=WXyi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----