Re: User support for the debian-chinese-*

"Shih-Yuan Lee (FourDollars)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.user.chinese.gb,gmane.linux.debian.user.chinese.big5
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dear Zu,

您注意一下 li xin 直接寄o我的息 "问题不大啊~你可以只看繁体的,就和现在一样;简体你不习惯可以不看,如同这篇。"
@位朋友回了一封w]件o我我e看w信件~ @行榈谋旧聿痪褪窃迫小弟看他寄^淼暮w信件了? 跟所^的 maillist 的默Jt一cPS都]有
小弟只是反陂xw上有困y(K不是]有能力x), 反 big5 c gb 合, 建h另_ utf8

2008/5/19 Zu <[email protected]>:
> 这个mail list缺省是回复给上一个发信人的,如果点击"全部回复",则会cc给<listname>@lists.debian.org。所以直接寄到个人邮箱(就是所谓的"强迫")应该是这个maillist的默认规则,不是被强迫的。如果不希望这样,则可以选择退出邮件列表,或者让maillist的管理员修改一下规则,或者提前邮件里面声明一下
> "请不要直接给我回信,回信的时候把我的地址从收件人或者cc列表中删除" 了
>
> --
> 瑞豪开源VPS - 基于Linux/Xen - 最低58元/月 - 免费试用
> http://www.RasHost.com
>
> 2008/5/19 Shih-Yuan Lee (FourDollars) <[email protected]>:
>> To li xin:
>>
>> @位鹊氐呐笥, 不好意思, 您都已直接寄到小弟的信箱中了, 小弟只有被迫xw的感X, 您不直接寄到小弟的信箱中.
>> 若您是寄到 mailing list 上面那另e~ 麻┠⒛难哉及意直接寄到 mailing list 上面好? 好大家知道您的意及感受.
>>
>> 2008/5/19 li xin <[email protected]>:
>>> 问题不大啊~你可以只看繁体的,就和现在一样;简体你不习惯可以不看,如同这篇。
>>>
>>> 2008/5/19 Shih-Yuan Lee (FourDollars) <[email protected]>:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> 小弟T看繁w字
>>>> 在xw字上有困y
>>>> 因此反
>>>>
>>>> 2008/4/30 Kanru Chen <[email protected]>:
>>>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we should respect the opinions from who are actually using the
>>>>> lists, so I forward this mail to the lists.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2008/4/30 Andrew Lee <[email protected]>:
>>>>>> Dear folks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Foka went on IRC and ask for merge debian-chinese-big5 and
>>>>>>  debian-chinese-gb into one mailing list. Please check the log for
>>>>>>  details or read these(I copied from my log) below:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  01:56 < foka> 我最近有想法:如果把 debian-chinese-big5 和
>>>>>>  debian-chinese-gb
>>>>>>               二合橐唬蠹铱捶ㄈ绾危 :-)
>>>>>>  01:57 < aguai> foka: 不懂?
>>>>>>  01:57 < paulliu> 唔...樯兑鲞@件事??..:P
>>>>>>  01:57 < paulliu> aguai, 那是 mailing list
>>>>>>  01:58 < foka> paulliu, 是@拥模含F在都是 UTF-8 年代了,也不再存在以前
>>>>>>               Big5、GB2312 ]件ya的}了。
>>>>>>  01:58 < paulliu> 嗯, 的_...不^我是@N想的...其那 big5 的意思是
>>>>>>                  chinese-traditional
>>>>>>  01:59 < paulliu> m然大家都是中...不^繁w跟w..是幸恍╅x上
>>>>>>  的困_..
>>>>>>  02:01 < paulliu> 不^, debian-chinese-big5 ]有甚N traffic 就是了..
>>>>>>  02:01 < paulliu> 然@只是我的看法而已啦..
>>>>>>  02:01 < paulliu> 我是X得, 繁w中文跟w中文, 有r是分_的...
>>>>>>  02:02 < foka> 其整w碚f好;我JR好多台淼呐笥眩芸焓熳Rw字
>>>>>>  了。大朋友看繁w字,倒也不是},只是不出矶选
>>>>>>  02:02 < paulliu> 是可以看的懂, 但是我自己的是...偶要猜...
>>>>>>  02:03 < foka> paulliu, 呵呵,正好互相W。 :-)
>>>>>>  02:03 < paulliu> 也Sw中文猜中意思的C率是 9x%, 日文h字 4x%......
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Debian do have lists for different languages. I think it's easier for
>>>>>>  support our users. Cause they can use their mother language to ask
>>>>>>  question and got answer by the mother language. We have separately lists
>>>>>>  because long time ago, we have encoding difference problem on big5 and
>>>>>>  gb2312, so that we have two lists for Chinese.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  But my opinion now Debian is a global community, it is not specfic for
>>>>>>  any nation or racism. Who use traditional or simplified Chinese are
>>>>>>  equal participant.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  But everyone can has opinion. Paulliu said that traditional and
>>>>>>  simplified Chinese are all Chinese, which I agreed. And Paulliu also
>>>>>>  think traditional and simplified Chinese should be separate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  However the point I concerned is our users support and free software
>>>>>>  community.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  So I'd like to ask, what's you guys' opinion:
>>>>>>  Does our community only limited in Taiwan or China?
>>>>>>  Do you guys agree people from over the world can be also part of Debian
>>>>>>  community?
>>>>>>  You guys prefer to do the user support together or separately, and why?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Please give your valuable opinion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Kindest regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  -Andrew
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>  ~ Kanru Chen <[email protected]>
>>>>>  'v' http://stu.csie.ncnu.edu.tw/~kanru.96/
>>>>>  // \\ GnuPG-Key ID: 365CC7A2
>>>>>  /( )\ Fingerprint: 3278 DFB4 BB28 6E8C 9E1F 1ECB B1B7 5B5F 365C C7A2
>>>>>  ^`~'^
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.