Re: Qt 6.8.2 incoming

Andrey Rakhmatullin <[email protected]> Sun, 2 Mar 2025 19:48:08 +0500

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.user.kde
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 07:12:31AM -0700, Antonio Russo wrote:
>src:kwin is uninstallable 

Not sure which binary packages you actually wanted to mention here but at 
least kwin-x11 is installable.

> because it needs to be rebuilt [1]

It doesn't say that though? Unless you run riscv64.

> in turn because src:layer-shell-qt
> needs to also be rebuilt against the new qt6-base-private-abi [3].

No? That link doesn't say that?

>I'm trying to understand how to navigate the buildd status website [4], but
>the output there is confusing to me: why isn't kwin listed as BD-uninstallable?

Because they are installable and it was built successfully?

>Also, why isn't layer-shell-qt anywhere on that list (specifically as needs-build,
>maybe)?

Because it was also built successfully?

> I similarly don't see anything in [5].

It's in sid for 2 days already?

>I.e., isn't [6] the wanna-build [7] state of layer-shell-qt?

Yes.

> The documentation
>for the "needs-build" state is a little confusing, but--naively--I would have
>thought that layer-shell-qt should be marked as "needs-build".

It was already built?

>Is there some manual action that needs to be taken there?

No? Why?

>If not, is there
>some other status page that indicates the status of the auto-rebuild?

Either I'm missing something very obvious, or you are missing something 
very obvious, or maybe you composed this email e.g. several days ago and 
sent it only now? Can you please explain in details what do you think is 
not rebuilt and where do those pages say that? Thanks.

-- 
WBR, wRAR

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 894 B)