Re: removing ftp:// from mirrors lists
Mattias Wadenstein <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.user.mirrors |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, David Precious wrote: > On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:20:28 +0200 (CEST) > Mattias Wadenstein <[email protected]> wrote: >> Because the ftp.ccTLD.debian.org names will need to stay around for >> at least 3-5 years from now, even if we can come to a conclusion to >> rename things ASAP this afternoon. > > Sure, but continuing to use ftp.* as the primary name for a server that > doesn't offer FTP any more just seems plain silly. Changing them to, > say, mirror.ccTLD.debian.org, and leaving ftp.ccTLD.debian.org as a > CNAME to mirror.ccTLD.debian.org would be easy and sensible. This is already the case today, there is no requirement for a ftp.ccTLD.debian.org to offer anything but /debian/ over HTTP, and DSA will happily repoint it to any service that provides that well for the region. >> The fact of it is that for many mirrors (and for the Debian mirror >> list checker), FTP is a deprecated legacy protocol that noone cares >> enough to fix anything for anymore, and any users lead into using it >> are users lead towards a worse user experience. > > ... and with that you jump to "I (and probably some other mirror admins) > don't want to support FTP, so all mention of it and support for it > should be withdrawn right now" which: > > (a) concerns me, as people do still use FTP, and I'm sure there's > plenty of mirror operators out there who will continue to provide FTP > access, whichever way the discussion goes (I will); the mirror list > should, IMO, indicate which mirrors are providing FTP service and which > aren't; Of course they are using it, we're advertising it to be used! This is what should stop, if we have any concern for our users. /Mattias Wadenstein