Re: Gentoo Portage

JAMES BROWNING <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.distributions.gobo.general
Message-ID <CAFOcotvHM10_=VPxgW+nzV-kt+enJP5yja+0yiquxYVHO4bc9g@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Trans <[email protected]> wrote:

> I am curious about the differences between GoboLinux's Compile script and
> Gentoo's Portage system. First, I would assume Portage is more mature and
> capable than Compile? Then I wonder how feasible it would be to modify/fork
> Portage to handle Gobo's file hierarchy?
>
> Can anyone offer insights into these questions and/or provide other
> insights of comparison?
>

I thought of something like this a while back. The Gentoo Prefix project
looks
vaguely like a starting point. mostly It would seem to be an issue of
setting
PREFIX and such when executing the prebuild enviroment setup.
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/prefix/
#gentoo-prefix on freenode IIRC.

Also portage can generate some annoying dependency issues that only really
show up when installing binary packages.
the cause there seems to be different dependency information in the package
manage and the binaries in the package.
I never went anywhere with my own stuff. (being almost completely useless)
--JamesB192

_______________________________________________
gobolinux-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.