Re: Progress on a "spiritual" derivation of GoboLinux
Trans <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.distributions.gobo.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEu+kw2JCM4jfsP5XK9VFsA4w+fpbs=0P5C=a+ZM6KAXfNmhuw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Michael Homer <[email protected]>wrote: > ViewFS is largely orthogonal. There would be no links at all with it, > but without it everything in /usr/*/ would be a symlink, just like > now. bin would have the exact contents of Executables, and so on. > Ok, I get it now. That makes sense. > >> To the other messages, categorical namespacing of programs is silly, > >> arbitrary, and purposeless. > > Could you elaborate on that? I am not 100% sure I know what you are > > referring to. > This: > system/ > app/ > etc/ > home/ > common/ > app/ > etc/ > home/ > joe/ > app/ > etc/ > (and the other one) comes up a lot and isn't really useful. > If I understand what you are saying, then yea I agree. Generally there is little sense in install software per user --rather it makes more sense to install it globaly and control access to particular users if need be. Nonetheless there are still many occasions when people install software per user. It is especially common amount web-hosting servers as the admins aren't keen on officially providing and maintainaing every software package under the sun. Please correct me if this isn't what you meant. Btw, have any of you guys seen http://objectroot.org/ I not 100% sure about it yet, but my initial impression, I have to say I am quite impressed. I may incorporate this into the design. Would love to hear others take on it. trans _______________________________________________ gobolinux-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users