Re: Continuing Quest for Spiritual Successor

Trans <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.distributions.gobo.general
Message-ID <CAEu+kw2rNYJ7FGZpYE-ORzGxAvbkJj+wi6EOpAJ5-8tNHXf7hQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Liam Proven <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 10 September 2013 15:20, Trans <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I have narrowed down the file hierarchy to one of two designs.
> >
> >
> https://github.com/gotolinux/gotolinux.github.com/wiki/New-File-Hierarchy---Alternates
> >
> > Appreciate your thoughts.
>
> As I think I have said to you before, pretty much - neither of these
> makes _any_ sense at all to me. Again, I'd say, go with the Gobo
> layout, which seems to be well-considered, sensible and reasonable to
> me.
>
> I'd have no interest at all in trying to use either of your systems,
> I'm afraid. They are incomprehensible to me. I do not think you will
> attract any users just on the basis of "hey, look at my directory
> layout, it's _different_!" I think it has to make sense to other
> people, to be understandable and clear. I'm afraid that to me, yours
> is not.
>

I am a bit surprised you don't follow the second design at all. It's based
on the idea of giving every user a GoboLinux Rootless setup, then adding an
"all" user group with the same setup  that they all share. Essentially what
was under the root directory in GoboLinux is simply moved to "all".

_______________________________________________
gobolinux-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.