Re: ...best place to ask questions and to get help?
Jean-Roch HUET <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.distributions.gobo.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I guess Enlightment has been chosen pour resources reasons. But If GoboLinux is a Normal Linux, we may be able to install KDE like any other program. Or any other GUI... Le 27/03/2015 02:24, Mark Filipak a écrit : > On 03/26/2015 08:05 PM, Hugo Barrocas wrote: >> Gobo 014.1 used KDE. >> >> Gobo 015 now uses Enlightenment :) > > Ah! Well, that answers the question in my other posting. > > I hope I don't offend anyone because I just want to express how I feel > about Windowed operating systems. > > 1, The best was Windows NT 3.51. It's been steadily downhill since then. > I'm almost kidding about this ...almost. I was working at Intel as a > system architect at the time Microsoft invented Active-X as a means to > bypass the call gate security mechanism to enable kernel drivers to be > installed directly from user-land. We were horrified and warned > Microsoft not to do it. That decision led directly to root kits which > led to root kit viruses. I realize I'm not talking about Linux, but no > Linux that I've seen has half the functionality of Windows. Sorry, but > Linux is a hack. That doesn't stop me from using Linux (I'm writing this > in a Linux Mint+Xfce guest running in VirtualBox inside Windows 7), but > Linux will never be a well-integrated operating system. > > 2, I cannot live with Enlightenment. I've compiled my complaints & a > wish list: > > Enlightenment has no contextual help. > Instead, I want contextual help available for each window, each dialog. > And I want the ability to add my own notes to the help dialogs. If an > application has no contextual help, I want the OS to add a help button > to the title bar that hoists a contextual help note of my own design. > > Rolling over icons provoke pop-ups. > I find this to be incredibly irritating. I want rollovers to do nothing > at all. > > Applications launch on single-click. > Instead, I want single-clicks to select, double-clicks to launch. For > applications that do not behave that way, I want the OS to provide a > wrapper that enforces my desired behavior. > > There are icon bars in lieu of menus. > Instead, I want menus, only. I don't want icons at all. Also, I want the > ability to change the text of menu items. Also, I want the ability to > add my own notes as menu items. > > There is no system menu. > Instead, I want a menu system that has unlimited hierarchical levels. In > addition to links that launch applications, I want the ability to add links > that point to local data files and to on-line content that automatically > opens them when they are double-clicked. > > If the process that has the focus is blocked, I want the OS to take > control of the cursor and display the 'busy' cursor. > > I want all applications to be prevented from stealing the focus. > > I don't want special effects, transitions, compositing, or whatever you > call it. I want my OS ugly and brilliant, not pretty and stupid. > > Just my thoughts. I know they will be rejected. YMMV. > > I really like the concept of GoboLinux. I've been using Linux Mint for a > few months. As with all Linux flavors, the way files are sprayed across > the disk drives me postal. I thought of using hardlinks to straighten > things out, then discovered Gobo has already done it. But it appears > that Gobo is just trying to be yet another pretty face. I'm looking for > real improvements in functionality. I run a computer, not a cell phone. > I'll probably be moving on. > _______________________________________________ > gobolinux-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users >