Re: package reordering / rene repos.
Clifford Wolf <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.distributions.rock.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 02:21:58PM +0100, Benjamin Schieder wrote: > > [ packages to move to base ] > I'd also add fetchmail to this list. hmm.. what about moving it to 'blindcoder' instead? ;-) > > Everyone would be free to 'adopt' packages from the 'public' repository and > > I wouldn't accept patches who create new packages in 'public'. > Would those packages then be moved to their respective owners repository? yes. yours, - clifford -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS/IT/ED/O d-(++) s-: a? C++++$ UL*++++@$ P+++@$ L++++$ E--- W(++)@ !N !o K? w-- O- M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t- 5++++ X R* tv b++(++++) DI++++ D- G !e* ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ If Python is executable pseudocode, then perl is executable line noise. _______________________________________________ rock-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.rocklinux.net/mailman/listinfo/rock-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCGeLfPNIEsfpKDdERAosLAKCq1iMPvwbmv28h5KWrMXYiPPrqqgCfaLxl I4mg1GB2WwvEpZZEpYnew3c= =+tzH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----