Re: Bad performance with aacraid
Xose Vazquez Perez <[email protected]> Wed, 07 May 2003 21:00:41 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.aacraid.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bas Goes wrote: >So now I have been looking into the Suse kernel but I can not find >anything special why the performance is so good. Could it be that you you are a brave, because SuSE puts a lot of patches ( http://kernelnewbies.org/kernels/SuSE81/SOURCES/patches ) and it is really hard to know which one make the difference ;-) Linux kernel is a chaos field. Distributions have kernel fixes not found into official version for 'unknown reasons'. I wish 2.4.22 would be shorter than .21, and it would contain _all fixes_ more than new features. >use the cdrom as your main filesystem? Are these figures produced with >the suse livecd absurd? Has anyone found a way to get the performance >out of adaptec scsi controllers when it didn't work out in the first >place? you can give a try to new aacraid version 1.1.2: http://www.domsch.com/linux/aacraid/aacraid-2003-05-05-test.tgz regards, -- Galiza nin perdoa nin esquence. Governo demision! _______________________________________________ Linux-aacraid-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-aacraid-devel Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq or search the list archives at http://lists.us.dell.com/htdig/