Re: Airnic

jrobison-/[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.linux.drivers.atmel-wlan
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The airnic I have uses the 503A chip(I took it appart)
The driver I am using is 2.1.2.2

Thanks.

Joe

> Send Atmel-wlan-usb mailing list submissions to
> 	atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://iprserv.jura.uni-leipzig.de/mailman/listinfo/atmel-wlan-usb
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	atmel-wlan-usb-request-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	atmel-wlan-usb-admin-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
> "Re: Contents of Atmel-wlan-usb digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: usb-Atmel - Ad0-Hoc - ZyAIR B-200 - Wifi Link
>        OK, TCP/IP Link dead (Joerg Albert)
>    2. Re: usb-Atmel - Ad0-Hoc - ZyAIR B-200 - Wifi Link OK, TCP/IP Link
> dead (Joerg Mertin) 3. Re: Problem with TEW-USB WEP ?
> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Ingegno_di_Luca_Macci=F2?=) 4. Re: Problem with
> TEW-USB WEP ? (Joerg Albert)
>    5. Re: usb-Atmel - Ad0-Hoc - ZyAIR B-200 - Wifi Link
>        OK, TCP/IP Link dead (Joerg Albert)
>    6. Re: Berlios driver and debian 2.4.20-i586-tsc (was
>        Re: Kernel error) (Florin Buzesteanu)
>    7. Re: Re: Atmel-wlan-usb digest, Vol 1 #410 - 12 msgs (Joerg Albert)
> 8. OOPS on startup (Jody Goldberg)
>    9. Re: OOPS on startup (Joerg Albert)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 13:50:14 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Joerg Albert <[email protected]>
> To: atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
> Subject: Re: [Atmel-WLAN-USB] usb-Atmel - Ad0-Hoc - ZyAIR B-200 - Wifi
> Link
>  OK, TCP/IP Link dead
> Reply-To: atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
>
> Hi Jörg,
>
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Joerg Mertin wrote:
>
>>  From my Networking Background - what I see is that the Sun-System has
>> a
>> weird setup. The iwconfig output gives me the mac address of the
>> remote device - however the ifconfig shows the Mac address of the
>> Local device. Seems like a proxy-Arping to me - but how am I supposed
>> to configure a routing table into that ?
>
> iwconfig never displays the local MAC address under "Cell:".
> It shows either the IBSS id choosen if it has started its own IBSS in
> ad-hoc mode or the (I)BSS id joined if (a) in managed mode or (b) if it
> had joined an already existing IBSS (i.e. if it was not the first STA
> started for a given SSID in mode ad-hoc).
>
>> Note - that I can run the Prism3 based Wifi under Windows XP - and
>> there is no difference in beheaviour at all - so I really think the
>> problem is on the atmel-device side.
>
> Not necessarily. Old Prism2 firmware (you didn't post which one you use)
> seems to have problems in ad-hoc mode - grep the lwlan-ng mailing lists.
> I had a Prism2 PCMCIA card with 0.8.3 inside which (if it started the
> IBSS first) sometimes decided to leave the IBSS by itself.
> Windows driver might load newer fw versions into RAM on startup.
>
> Try starting both devices in a different order (AFAIR starting the
> Atmel-USB first fixed my problem with the 0.8.3 Prism firmware - but I
> used the Berlios driver).
>
> I'm of little help with the Sourceforge USB driver.
> If you could get another Prism2/2.5/3 device you may use it in monitor
> mode to trace the air traffic.
>
> /Jörg
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 17:12:06 +0200 (CEST)
> Subject: Re: [Atmel-WLAN-USB] usb-Atmel - Ad0-Hoc - ZyAIR B-200 - Wifi
> Link OK, TCP/IP Link dead From: "Joerg Mertin" <[email protected]>
> To: <atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
>
> Hi Joerg,
>
> thx for the Hint. It's a prism3 card actually - from the following data:
> usb.c: registered new driver prism2_usb
> ident: nic h/w: id=0x8026 1.0.0
> ident: pri f/w: id=0x15 1.1.0
> ident: sta f/w: id=0x1f 1.4.2
>
> The 0x8026 Identifies it as a prism 3 chip.
> The Firmware version - I dojn't know which entry I have to use from
> head. 1.1.0 or 1.4.2 ? Well - so it's a fairly new card.
>
> Regarding the IBSS - I figured it out. However - what I never saw
> anywhere mentioned - is how do the BSSI need to be set for the Add-Hoc
> mode to work, and how do the Mac-Addresses on the ofconfig call work.
>
> So - does the CELL-Entry has to look the same on both sides ? Or, in
> case of a WiFi Link, do the devices exchange their IBSS's ?
> How about the Mac-Addresses of the "Virtual" network devices ? Are these
> also communicated to the remote side or not ?
>
> Could anyone here having a Working Add-Hoc config provide me the
> iwconfig and ifconfig output of their 2 Endpoints ? This would help me a
> lot.
>
> It's always hard to dig into something - when you don't know what it
> should look like :)
>
> Joerg Albert said:
>> Hi Jörg,
>>
>> On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Joerg Mertin wrote:
>>
>>>  From my Networking Background - what I see is that the Sun-System
>>> has
>>> a
>>> weird setup. The iwconfig output gives me the mac address of the
>>> remote device - however the ifconfig shows the Mac address of the
>>> Local device. Seems like a proxy-Arping to me - but how am I supposed
>>> to configure a routing table into that ?
>>
>> iwconfig never displays the local MAC address under "Cell:".
>> It shows either the IBSS id choosen if it has started its own IBSS in
>> ad-hoc mode or the (I)BSS id joined if (a) in managed mode or (b) if
>> it had joined an already existing IBSS (i.e. if it was not the first
>> STA started for a given SSID in mode ad-hoc).
>
> So - If I understood correctly - in case B here, Pandora had it's IBSS:
> 02:A0:70:C0:63:CE - and when I tell my Atmel based device to connect it,
> this one will copy the IBSS from Pandora to the Sun System, showing me
> the same IBSS in the Cell line ...
> So far - so good. got that one.
>
>>> Note - that I can run the Prism3 based Wifi under Windows XP - and
>>> there is no difference in beheaviour at all - so I really think the
>>> problem is on the atmel-device side.
>>
>> Not necessarily. Old Prism2 firmware (you didn't post which one you
>> use) seems to have problems in ad-hoc mode - grep the lwlan-ng mailing
>> lists. I had a Prism2 PCMCIA card with 0.8.3 inside which (if it
>> started the IBSS first) sometimes decided to leave the IBSS by itself.
>> Windows driver might load newer fw versions into RAM on startup.
>>
>> Try starting both devices in a different order (AFAIR starting the
>> Atmel-USB first fixed my problem with the 0.8.3 Prism firmware - but I
>> used the Berlios driver).
>
> Ohf - you're talking to an Old LInux guy here :) That was the third
> thing I tried out ;)
> BTW - does the Berlios Driver support the iwconfig from the wireless
> tools ???
> The linux-wlan-ng has an own set of tools - and I do admit I do prefere
> using the wireless-tools API. It's coping better into the ifconfig logic
> :)
>
>
>> I'm of little help with the Sourceforge USB driver.
>> If you could get another Prism2/2.5/3 device you may use it in monitor
>> mode to trace the air traffic.
>
> Actually - I do have a ZyAir B100 hanging around here. The Problem is
> that I have only a very  old subnotebook with a 486DX2-50MHz System -
> and a very old Linux Redhat-6.1 Distribution runing on it. Maybe I'll
> give it a try to compile the drivers etc.
>
> Thanx & Cheers
>
> 	Joerg
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Joerg Mertin              :  [email protected]                (Home)|
> | in Neuchâtel/Schweiz      :                                          |
> | Stardust's LiNUX System   :                                          |
> | PGP 2.6.3in Key on Demand :  Voice & Fax: +41(0)32 / 725 52 54       |
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Home-Page: http://www.solsys.org
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ingegno_di_Luca_Macci=F2?= <[email protected]>
> To: <atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org>
> Subject: Re: [Atmel-WLAN-USB] Problem with TEW-USB WEP ?
> Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 17:23:18 +0200
> Reply-To: atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
>
> Hi Jörg
>
> I will be happy for test the version cvs version to 0.11beta3 with my
> TEW-USB
>
> but I've not found it on web http://at76c503a.berlios.de/ where I've
> download previous version 0.10.
>
> Send me a message with link or directly the file.
>
> Best regard's Luca.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joerg Albert" <[email protected]>
> To: <atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [Atmel-WLAN-USB] Problem with TEW-USB WEP ?
>
>
>> Hi Luca,
>>
>> On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Luca Macciò wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Jörg, I've found my problem on at76c503.c for truncated 4 bits
>> !!!
>> >
>> > I've corrected after line 2824 in function
>> *check_for_rx_frags(struct at76c503 *dev)
>> > where is a (length-4 ) when copy packet and than working OK !
>> > ...
>>
>> Seems like firmware 0.84.0 does not send the trailing FCS in rx data
>> packets. I've updated the cvs version to 0.11beta3 which should handle
>> this feature properly. Could you please try the cvs snapshot with your
>> adapter?
>>
>> /Jörg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Atmel-wlan-usb mailing list
>> Atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
>> https://iprserv.jura.uni-leipzig.de/mailman/listinfo/atmel-wlan-usb
>>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 18:27:19 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Joerg Albert <[email protected]>
> To: atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
> Subject: Re: [Atmel-WLAN-USB] Problem with TEW-USB WEP ?
> Reply-To: atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
>
> Hi Luca,
>
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Ingegno di Luca Macciò wrote:
>
>> I will be happy for test the version cvs version to 0.11beta3 with my
>> TEW-USB
>>
>> but I've not found it on web http://at76c503a.berlios.de/ where I've
>> download previous version 0.10.
>>
>> Send me a message with link or directly the file.
>
> I was talking about the latest cvs snapshot at
> http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/at76c503a/at76c503a.tar.gz?tarball=1
> (0.11beta3 is not a released version).
>
> /Jörg
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 19:22:56 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Joerg Albert <[email protected]>
> To: atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
> Subject: Re: [Atmel-WLAN-USB] usb-Atmel - Ad0-Hoc - ZyAIR B-200 - Wifi
> Link
>  OK, TCP/IP Link dead
> Reply-To: atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
>
> Hi Jörg,
>
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Joerg Mertin wrote:
>
>> ident: nic h/w: id=0x8026 1.0.0
>> ident: pri f/w: id=0x15 1.1.0
>> ident: sta f/w: id=0x1f 1.4.2
> I was talking about the station fw - your 1.4.2 is fairly new.
>
>> Regarding the IBSS - I figured it out. However - what I never saw
>> anywhere mentioned - is how do the BSSI need to be set for the Add-Hoc
>> mode to work, and how do the Mac-Addresses on the ofconfig call work.
>>
>> So - does the CELL-Entry has to look the same on both sides ? Or, in
>> case of a WiFi Link, do the devices exchange their IBSS's ?
>
> - BSS = basic service set = 2+ STA communicating
> - IBSS = independent BSS = 2+ STA in ad-hoc mode
> - ESS = extended service set = 1+ BSS connected by a distribtion
>   system (DS). Each BSS contains one access point which acts as a
>   STA (station) and connects the BSS to the DS.
>
> Each BSS has its own BSSID = MAC address like id. The BSSID of an IBSS
> is marked as temporary (bit 43 set to 1) and is randomly choosen on each
> start of the IBSS. The BSSID of a BSS created by an access point usually
> is its normal MAC address.
>
> Furthermore each BSS has a service set ID (SSID) = a (normally
> human readable) name of the IBSS/ESS.
>
> iwconfig always calls the SSID "essid" and the BSSID "Cell:".
>
> For ad-hoc mode, the "Cell:" entries must show the same addr. Be aware
> that wlan-ng does not fully support the wireless extensions, i.e. using
> iwconfig to obtain information may be broken. In my case iwconfig did
> not show the correct "Cell:" id, I had to use their own tools
> (wlanctl-ng/wlancfg ?).
>
> In ad-hoc mode the first STA started usually scans for the given SSID
> and if it cannot find a IBSS with it, starts its own, choosing a random
> BSSID and using the configure channel. The second STA scans as well and
> find this IBSS. If this fails for any reason, it starts a second IBSS
> and no communication is possible.
>
>> How about the Mac-Addresses of the "Virtual" network devices ? Are
>> these also communicated to the remote side or not ?
> What are "virtual" network devices?
>
>> Could anyone here having a Working Add-Hoc config provide me the
>> iwconfig and ifconfig output of their 2 Endpoints ? This would help me
>> a lot.
>
> no, sorry, have no running ad-hoc config here. But IMHO your setup looks
> OK. I would:
> - compare the Prism2's iwconfig output to the wlan tools' output
> - try different start order
> - run tcpdump in the background in case some data got corrupted
> - check if ARP entries are received for the peer
> - try broadcast pings
>
> /Jörg
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 21:19:25 +0200
> From: [email protected] (Florin Buzesteanu)
> To: atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
> Subject: Re: [Atmel-WLAN-USB] Berlios driver and debian 2.4.20-i586-tsc
> (was
>  Re: Kernel error)
> Reply-To: atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
>
> Hi Joerg,
>
> I got the problem under debian i have looked at the Makefile in the
> Berlios drivers and have see that this:
> -----------------------------------
> KERNEL_SRC = /lib/modules/$(KERNEL_VERSION)/build
> KERNEL_HEADERS = $(KERNEL_SRC)/include
> -----------------------------------
>
> can not match on my System, so i have do an link with:
> -----------------------------------
> ln -s /usr/src/linux /lib/modules/2.4.20-1-586tsc/build
> -----------------------------------
> because the build directory is not there, and now the drivers work
> perfect and since 2 days i have no kernel crash.
>
> so a very big thx for your help.
>
> /Florin
>
>
> Joerg Albert wrote:
>
>>Hi Florin,
>>
>>On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Florin Buzesteanu wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>router:~/# depmod -ae
>>>
>>>depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
>>>/lib/modules/2.4.20-1-586tsc/kernel/drivers/usb/at76c503-i3861.o
>>> depmod:         usb_deregister
>>>depmod:         usb_register
>>>depmod:         printk
>>>...
>>>
>>>dont know if this are errors, hope not ;)
>>>
>>>
>>
>>These are errors: loading these modules will fail, because there
>>external symbol references cannot be satisfied by the running kernel or
>> some other modules, i.e. the problem you get later.
>>
>>Seems your kernel has symbol versioning, while the Makefile of
>>the driver cannot see it. Either the sources don't match the running
>> kernel or the Makefile is broken. Please post the output of:
>> grep CONFIG_MODVERSIONS \
>>   /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/include/linux/autoconf.h
>> grep printk /proc/ksyms
>>
>>
>>
>>>router:~/# grep usbdfu /proc/ksyms
>>>
>>>c59347dc usbdfu_register_R__ver_usbdfu_register [usbdfu]
>>>c5934864 usbdfu_deregister_R__ver_usbdfu_deregister     [usbdfu]
>>> c5934914 usbdfu_in_use_R__ver_usbdfu_in_use     [usbdfu]
>>>c5934a68 usbdfu_initiate_download_R__ver_usbdfu_initiate_download
>>> [usbdfu] c5934000
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Wonder how you got the _R_ tail here. I don't know the settings of this
>> debain kernel. What does a
>>	grep usbdfu_ <your kernel root dir>/include/linux/modules/*
>>reveal? Did you compile your own kernel from these sources?
>>
>>
>>
>>>this are the berlios 0.10 driver have download the latest snapshot
>>> from there but i can not compile it.
>>>
>>>get this error:
>>>
>>>----------------------------------------------
>>>router:~/at76c503a# make
>>>gcc -MD -O2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing
>>> -fno-common -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-unused-variable -D__KERNEL__
>>> -DMODULE -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -DDRIVER_VERSION=\"v0.11beta2\"
>>>-I/lib/modules/2.4.20-1-586tsc/build/include  -c at76c503.c
>>>cc1: Invalid option `-Wno-unused-variable'
>>>make: *** [at76c503.o] Error 1
>>>----------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>That option was introduced recently to suppress warnings of gcc 3.3
>> (the version SuSE 8.2 installs) while compiling kernel headers.
>>What's your gcc version ("gcc --version")?
>>
>>IMHO the latest cvs snapshot won't fix the insmod problems above.
>>
>>/Jörg
>>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 21:54:13 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Joerg Albert <[email protected]>
> To: atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
> Subject: Re: [Atmel-WLAN-USB] Re: Atmel-wlan-usb digest, Vol 1 #410 - 12
> msgs Reply-To: atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
>
> Hi Joel,
>
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 jrobison-/[email protected] wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I finnaly  got my Airnic to work...  kinda...
>> the driver loads
>> i can use scan and pick up the AP.
>> the only broblem is i can never authenticate..
>> I think this is because for some off reason it is mis-reporting the
>> MAC address. odd huh?
>> is there a patch for this at all?
>> the MAC it shows     : A0:E3:08:10:80:E5
>> the MAC on the nic is: 00:30:1A:00:24:8C
>> the MAC on the AP is : 00:80:C8:AD:19:E5
>>
>> this is really odd...
>> anyone got a clue as to why?
>
> Which version of the Sourceforge driver do you use?
>
> Which radio chipset did you assume?
> Rumours are that the AirNic contains a Intersil 3861 radio set, i.e. you
> must use snapshot 2002-12-09 (or older) and put your USB ids in the
> correct array.
> You may be able to check this assumption if you search for your FCC ID
> at http://www.fcc.gov/oet/fccid/
> and look at the internal photos.
>
> /Jörg
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 16:25:11 -0400
> To: atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
> From: Jody Goldberg <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Atmel-WLAN-USB] OOPS on startup
> Reply-To: atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
>
>
> --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> I've been trying the snapshots regularly for a while now under
> 2.4.20.  Things have gotten marginally better recently, only the
> keyboard locks up now.  Strangely the atmel driver did actually
> mostly work a few months ago until I tried the berlios driver.  Now both
> are unhappy.
>
> Today I tried a nice fresh 2.4.21 + 0.11beta3 (July 12 snapshot)
> with no appreciable change.
>
> Any insight on the attached oops ?
> It corresponds to manually loading the rfmd drivers via modprobe and
> plugging a netgear 101b into the usb slot of a sony vaio sr7 laptop. The
> config is pretty vanilla, I've tried various combinations of
> debug enabled/disabled with varying levels of lockup.
>
> --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="oops.txt"
>
> ksymoops 2.4.8 on i686 2.4.21.  Options used
>      -V (default)
>      -k /proc/ksyms (default)
>      -l /proc/modules (default)
>      -o /lib/modules/2.4.21/ (default)
>      -m /boot/System.map-2.4.21 (default)
>
> Warning: You did not tell me where to find symbol information.  I will
> assume that the log matches the kernel and modules that are running
> right now and I'll use the default options above for symbol resolution.
> If the current kernel and/or modules do not match the log, you can get
> more accurate output by telling me the kernel version and where to find
> map, modules, ksyms etc.  ksymoops -h explains the options.
>
> Jul 12 15:07:14 laptop kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at
> virtual address 0060002b Jul 12 15:07:14 laptop kernel: cc84615c
> Jul 12 15:07:14 laptop kernel: *pde = 00000000
> Jul 12 15:07:14 laptop kernel: Oops: 0000
> Jul 12 15:07:14 laptop kernel: CPU:    0
> Jul 12 15:07:14 laptop kernel: EIP:    0010:[<cc84615c>]    Not tainted
> Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386
> Jul 12 15:07:14 laptop kernel: EFLAGS: 00013206
> Jul 12 15:07:14 laptop kernel: eax: 0060000f   ebx: 00000000   ecx:
> c123be9c   edx: cba59d40 Jul 12 15:07:14 laptop kernel: esi: 000001f4
> edi: c123a000   ebp: c123be84   esp: c123be5c Jul 12 15:07:14 laptop
> kernel: ds: 0018   es: 0018   ss: 0018
> Jul 12 15:07:14 laptop kernel: Process keventd (pid: 2,
> stackpage=c123b000) Jul 12 15:07:14 laptop kernel: Stack: 000001f4
> cc84625a cba59d40 00000001 00000000 00000000 c123a000 00000000  Jul 12
> 15:07:14 laptop kernel:        00000000 00000023 c123be9c c123be9c
> 00000000 00000000 00000000 c123a000  Jul 12 15:07:14 laptop kernel:
>   c123be84 c123be84 00000000 c87455c0 00000005 c9dd2a00 cc8463c3
> cba59d40  Jul 12 15:07:14 laptop kernel: Call Trace:    [<cc84625a>]
> [<cc8463c3>] [<cc84646b>] [<cc853bc0>] [<cc847281>] Jul 12 15:07:14
> laptop kernel:   [<cc84a4b5>] [<cc88b75c>] [schedule+524/848]
> [__run_task_queue+90/112] [context_thread+307/448]
> [context_thread+0/448] Jul 12 15:07:14 laptop kernel: Code: 8b 40 1c 85
> c0 75 14 8d b6 00 00 00 00 8d bc 27 00 00 00 00
>
>
>>>EIP; cc84615c <[usbcore]usb_submit_urb+1c/40>   <=====
>
>>>ecx; c123be9c <_end+f154d8/c51669c>
>>>edx; cba59d40 <_end+b73337c/c51669c>
>>>edi; c123a000 <_end+f1363c/c51669c>
>>>ebp; c123be84 <_end+f154c0/c51669c>
>>>esp; c123be5c <_end+f15498/c51669c>
>
> Trace; cc84625a <[usbcore]usb_start_wait_urb+7a/180>
> Trace; cc8463c3 <[usbcore]usb_internal_control_msg+63/70>
> Trace; cc84646b <[usbcore]usb_control_msg+9b/b0>
> Trace; cc853bc0 <[usbcore]hub_event_lock+0/0>
> Trace; cc847281 <[usbcore]usb_set_address+61/70>
> Trace; cc84a4b5 <[usbcore]usb_reset_device+b5/350>
> Trace; cc88b75c <[usbdfu]kevent+b0/148>
>
> Code;  cc84615c <[usbcore]usb_submit_urb+1c/40>
> 00000000 <_EIP>:
> Code;  cc84615c <[usbcore]usb_submit_urb+1c/40>   <=====
>    0:   8b 40 1c                  mov    0x1c(%eax),%eax   <=====
> Code;  cc84615f <[usbcore]usb_submit_urb+1f/40>
>    3:   85 c0                     test   %eax,%eax
> Code;  cc846161 <[usbcore]usb_submit_urb+21/40>
>    5:   75 14                     jne    1b <_EIP+0x1b>
> Code;  cc846163 <[usbcore]usb_submit_urb+23/40>
>    7:   8d b6 00 00 00 00         lea    0x0(%esi),%esi
> Code;  cc846169 <[usbcore]usb_submit_urb+29/40>
>    d:   8d bc 27 00 00 00 00      lea    0x0(%edi,1),%edi
>
>
> 1 warning issued.  Results may not be reliable.
>
> --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga--
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 11:26:27 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Joerg Albert <[email protected]>
> To: atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
> Subject: Re: [Atmel-WLAN-USB] OOPS on startup
> Reply-To: atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
>
> Hi Jody,
>
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Jody Goldberg wrote:
>
>> I've been trying the snapshots regularly for a while now under
>> 2.4.20.  Things have gotten marginally better recently, only the
>> keyboard locks up now.  Strangely the atmel driver did actually
>> mostly work a few months ago until I tried the berlios driver.  Now
>> both are unhappy.
>>
>> Today I tried a nice fresh 2.4.21 + 0.11beta3 (July 12 snapshot) with
>> no appreciable change.
>>
>> Any insight on the attached oops ?
>> It corresponds to manually loading the rfmd drivers via modprobe and
>> plugging a netgear 101b into the usb slot of a sony vaio sr7 laptop.
>> The config is pretty vanilla, I've tried various combinations of debug
>> enabled/disabled with varying levels of lockup.
>
>>From your oops it looks like the kernel crashes in
> usb.c:usb_submit_urb() when it tries to access the urb->dev->bus->op and
> urb->dev->bus == 0x60000f.
>
> I wasn't able to reproduce this error here with 2.4.21 and 0.11beta3.
> Tried usb-uhci,uhci and ohci both with and w/o external hubs.
> Are you using ehci?
>
> /Jörg
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> Atmel-wlan-usb mailing list
> Atmel-wlan-usb-ikZNBd7uB5wQUIZIPwn63sWURRETrGNnG9Ur7JDdleE@public.gmane.org
> https://iprserv.jura.uni-leipzig.de/mailman/listinfo/atmel-wlan-usb
>
>
> End of Atmel-wlan-usb Digest
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.