Re: No led
Wilkushka <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.ipw2100.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Wilkushka |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi! I would not say there is a regression between 2.6.15.27 and 2.6.15.26. When the led stopped waking up, I used the same ipw2200 driver. It's just as soon as I noticed that the led remained off that I decided to remove the driver provided by the kubuntu distribution to the latest stable, i.e. 1.2.0 but this didn't solve my problem. I issued the command modprobe ipw2200 led=1 without success. But there may be an issue. As Stefan Schmidt suggests it there may be something about the BIOS setting. I remember that I updated my BIOS at that time. I had a look at my BIOS and the wireless card is enabled. So this should work shouldn't it? I will recompile and reinstall the 1.2.0 driver and hope to give you good news. This will not be before next week as I don't have much time now. To reply to some of you my car is : Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 2200BG (rev 05) It's not an IBM card but looks like an Intel. I think all Thinkpads were delivered with this model when I bougt mine. Now I don't know about the new Levono brand. Another thing I noticed in the file : /sys/bus/pci/drivers/ipw2200/0000\:02\:02.0/led There is "0". I changed it to "1" but it didn't changed anything and switched to 0 after reboot. This may be a clue. Thanks again for your help. I will give you more news when I reinstall it and will keep a log of any potential warnings or errors during compilation. Best regards, -- Wilkushka On Tuesday 21 November 2006 03:29, Zhu Yi wrote: > On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 00:15 +0100, Wilkushka wrote: > > Thanks for your interest in my question and sorry if I have not been > > crystal clear in my explanation. > > > > In fact before I updated to the latest kernel release (to 2.6.15.27 from > > 2.6.15.26) the led was on when there was an access point or a wireless > > cell in the area. > > So there is a regression between kernel 2.6.15.26 and 2.6.15.27 ? Can > you confirm you are using the same ipw2200 driver and only the kernel > change makes the difference? > > -yi > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > ipw2100-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipw2100-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ipw2100-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipw2100-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 191 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFY3jr6ojTocxFHZ0RAsiPAJsFAOrfnJmrjqMtPNhVlBbZljOH7QCfQVdp OzvuQ1m3S4k+2ciobnGMpiY= =zv/7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----