Re: No led

Wilkushka <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.drivers.ipw2100.devel
Organization Wilkushka
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi!

I would not say there is a regression between 2.6.15.27 and 2.6.15.26. When 
the led stopped waking up, I used the same ipw2200 driver. It's just as soon 
as I noticed that the led remained off that I decided to remove the driver 
provided by the kubuntu distribution to the latest stable, i.e. 1.2.0 but 
this didn't solve my problem.

I issued the command modprobe ipw2200 led=1 without success. But there may be 
an issue. As Stefan Schmidt suggests it there may be something about the 
BIOS setting. I remember that I updated my BIOS at that time. I had a look at 
my BIOS and the wireless card is enabled. So this should work shouldn't it?

I will recompile and reinstall the 1.2.0 driver and hope to give you good 
news. This will not be before next week as I don't have much time now.

To reply to some of you my car is :
Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 2200BG (rev 05)

It's not an IBM card but looks like an Intel. I think all Thinkpads were 
delivered with this model when I bougt mine. Now I don't know about the new 
Levono brand.

Another thing I noticed in the file :
/sys/bus/pci/drivers/ipw2200/0000\:02\:02.0/led

There is "0". I changed it to "1" but it didn't changed anything and switched 
to 0 after reboot. This may be a clue.

Thanks again for your help. I will give you more news when I reinstall it and 
will keep a log of any potential warnings or errors during compilation.

Best regards,
--
Wilkushka


On Tuesday 21 November 2006 03:29, Zhu Yi wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 00:15 +0100, Wilkushka wrote:
> > Thanks for your interest in my question and sorry if I have not been
> > crystal clear in my explanation.
> >
> > In fact before I updated to the latest kernel release (to 2.6.15.27 from
> > 2.6.15.26) the led was on when there was an access point or a wireless
> > cell in the area.
>
> So there is a regression between kernel 2.6.15.26 and 2.6.15.27 ? Can
> you confirm you are using the same ipw2200 driver and only the kernel
> change makes the difference?
>
> -yi
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> ipw2100-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipw2100-devel

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

_______________________________________________
ipw2100-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipw2100-devel
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 191 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBFY3jr6ojTocxFHZ0RAsiPAJsFAOrfnJmrjqMtPNhVlBbZljOH7QCfQVdp
OzvuQ1m3S4k+2ciobnGMpiY=
=zv/7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.