Re: ipw2200: very slow association with Kernel 2.6.22
François Valenduc <[email protected]> Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:33:31 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.ipw2100.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
François Valenduc a écrit : > Zhu Yi a écrit : > >> On Sat, 2007-09-01 at 11:16 +0200, François Valenduc wrote: >> >> >>> If I use kernel 2.6.21 with the same version of >>> wpasupplicant, association occurs instantly. So, the problem seems to >>> be >>> with the ipw2200 or ieee80211 drivers rather than with wpasupplicant. >>> >>> Does anybody encounter the same problem ? Is there any solution to >>> it ? >>> >>> >> Which version of 2200 driver are you using? Did you also use the >> external ieee80211 module? Note, if you are using 2.6.22 kernel, you can >> use the in-tree driver and ieee80211 directly. >> >> Thanks, >> -yi >> >> >> > I use in both cases the in-tree driver for ipw2200 and ieee80211. But > finally, the problem might be caused by wpa_supplicant since now, it > also fails frequently with the 2.6.21 kernel. It seems that when > wpasupplicant starts, the ieee80211_crypt_tkip and michael_mic modules > are not loaded immediately. But if I run wpa_cli -i eth1 reassociate, > these modules are load immediately and association occurs instantly. So, > I have add these 2 modules to the /etc/modules file but it doesn't solve > the problem. > > Thanks for your help, > François Valenduc > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > ipw2100-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipw2100-devel > > Finally, the problem was caused by wpa_supplicant and not with the ipw2200 drivers. I had not noticed until now that there was another WIFI network in my neighborhood. So, I have changed the configuration of wpa_supplicant and I set the ap_scan parameter to 0 instead of 2. I thought the latter was needed to operate with hidden SSID but this doesn't seem to be the case. I also added a network in the wpa_supplicant.conf file corresponding to the other network and I disabled it. François Valenduc ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/