Re: ipw2200 low performance
Wilkushka <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Mar 2008 22:12:59 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.ipw2100.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Wilkushka |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi! Sorry for this. The mouse went faster than me :-) The problem you get with the bandwidth discrepancy between Linux and windoes is quite odd. Theoretically it should be the same. But the driver architecture for Linux developed by the Intel's team is quite different from the one embedded in windoes systems. There are hundreds of reasons for the phenomenon you currently encounter. I may be wrong and other more qualified people on this mailing list may give you another reason. It may come from the type of encryption you use. A very high level of encryption may reduce the bandwidth. You may have a low encryption on windoes, i.e. WEP, and a better and more secure encryption on Linux, i.e. WPA2 with AES. This may be one the reasons. You can try to set up the same encryption for both systems and check the bandwidth results are. Did you install the latest stable version of IPW2200 driver and firmware on Linux? Sorry if my explanation is of any help but the information you provide about your settings is vague. Cheers, -- Patrick Wolf On Friday 29 February 2008 15:40:39 Kanito 73 wrote: > Hello > > Your response arrived empty, just contains the footer :( > > Regards > > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:18:25 +0100 > > Subject: Re: [Ipw2100-devel] ipw2200 low performance > > > > On Thursday 28 February 2008 17:32:45 Kanito 73 wrote: > > > Hello list > > > > > > I have a laptop with ipw2200 wireless device, it is working but does > > > not use the highest speed it supports (it is running at 11Mbps)... The > > > most I get is 60-70Kb/s while under windoes it downloads at 105Kb/s > > > obviously when optimal conditions. I've made tests on the same sites > > > with windows and linux, and it just works at full speed under windows. > > > > > > What can be the problem? I was thinking on possible bad routing (have 2 > > > devices, a RJ-45 wired and the ipw2200 wireless) but the 'route' output > > > appears to be fine... My connection is 1Mbps but generally does not use > > > more than 500 or 600 Kbps. > > > > > > I hope somebody can help me > > > > > > Regards, > > > Miguel > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's > > > FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > ipw2100-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipw2100-devel > > _________________________________________________________________ > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ ipw2100-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipw2100-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHycbb6ojTocxFHZ0RAkmQAJ9vNZrVovqPK95JOfhG8QkB5acBDACffwm+ MXFjfgyG//ew67CwtKTU1YU= =+D9n -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----