Re: QoS prioritization doesn't work correctly and no QoS control fields
"Marco Talunzo" <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:58:43 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.ipw2100.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks, Yi!
These are the qos settings from the running-config file of my Cisco 1130AG
AP (qos capable):
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
traffic-class background cw-min 4 cw-max 10 fixed-slot 7
traffic-class best-effort cw-min 4 cw-max 10 fixed-slot 3
traffic-class video cw-min 3 cw-max 4 fixed-slot 2
traffic-class voice cw-min 2 cw-max 3 fixed-slot 2
dot11 qos class background
transmit-op 0
!
dot11 qos class best-effort
transmit-op 0
!
dot11 qos class video
transmit-op 3008
!
dot11 qos class voice
transmit-op 1504
!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They settings should be fine, I think. But when I capture the beacons or
probe_resp I see the two sets of vendor specific QoS settings: 'Aironet Qos'
and 'WME' (see frame below). They are a bit different from each other and
they do not match the settings I have in the running_config file (which is
strange).
Questions:
1) does ipw2200 understand such vendor specific Qos info in beacons?
2) If yes, then which set would be used by ipw2200: 'Aironet Qos' or 'WME'?
Thanks a million as always!!!!
Frame 1 (228 bytes on wire, 228 bytes captured)
Radiotap Header v0, Length 25
IEEE 802.11
Type/Subtype: Beacon frame (0x08)
Frame Control: 0x0080 (Normal)
Duration: 0
Destination address: Broadcast (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff)
Source address: Cisco_4f:33:80 (00:15:2c:4f:33:80)
BSS Id: Cisco_4f:33:80 (00:15:2c:4f:33:80)
Fragment number: 0
Sequence number: 1699
IEEE 802.11 wireless LAN management frame
Fixed parameters (12 bytes)
Tagged parameters (167 bytes)
SSID parameter set: "ntapc1a"
Supported Rates: 6.0 9.0 12.0(B) 18.0 24.0 36.0 48.0 54.0
Traffic Indication Map (TIM): DTIM 1 of 2 bitmap empty
Country Information: Country Code: DE, Any Environment
QBSS Load Element
Power Constraint: Tag 32 Len 1
Cisco Unknown 1 + Device Name
Symbol Proprietary: Tag 173 Len 15
Vendor Specific: Aironet Unknown
Vendor Specific: Aironet CCX version = 3
Vendor Specific: Aironet Qos
Tag Number: 221 (Vendor Specific)
Tag length: 22
Aironet IE type: Qos (4)
Aironet IE QoS unknown 1: 0x00
Aironet IE QoS paramset: 5
CCX QoS Parameters??: ACI 0 (Best Effort), Admission Control not
Mandatory, AIFSN 7, ECWmin 4, ECWmax 10, TXOP 0
CCX QoS Parameters??: ACI 1 (Background), Admission Control not
Mandatory, AIFSN 3, ECWmin 4, ECWmax 10, TXOP 0
CCX QoS Parameters??: ACI 2 (Video), Admission Control not
Mandatory, AIFSN 2, ECWmin 3, ECWmax 4, TXOP 0
CCX QoS Parameters??: ACI 3 (Voice), Admission Control not
Mandatory, AIFSN 2, ECWmin 2, ECWmax 3, TXOP 0
Vendor Specific: WME
Tag Number: 221 (Vendor Specific)
Tag length: 24
Tag interpretation: WME PE: type 2, subtype 1, version 1,
parameter set 5
Tag interpretation: WME AC Parameters: ACI 0 (Best Effort),
Admission Control not Mandatory, AIFSN 3, ECWmin 4, ECWmax 4, TXOP 0
Tag interpretation: WME AC Parameters: ACI 1 (Background),
Admission Control not Mandatory, AIFSN 7, ECWmin 4, ECWmax 4, TXOP 0
Tag interpretation: WME AC Parameters: ACI 2 (Video), Admission
Control not Mandatory, AIFSN 2, ECWmin 3, ECWmax 3, TXOP 94
Tag interpretation: WME AC Parameters: ACI 3 (Voice), Admission
Control not Mandatory, AIFSN 2, ECWmin 2, ECWmax 2, TXOP 47
2008/12/17 Zhu Yi <[email protected]>
> On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 17:52 +0800, Marco Talunzo wrote:
> > If ipw2200 debug output says that qos is enabled, but there are no QoS
> > control fields, it means only that the problem is with the access
> > point. Is this correct? (I enabled qos in my cisco AP, but I have some
> > reasons to believe that AP might not properly work).
>
> If the AP is not 11e/WMM capable, the driver won't use it. Make sure you
> see the qos info from beacon or proble_resp frames from AP.
>
> Thanks,
> -yi
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
ipw2100-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipw2100-devel