Re: QoS prioritization doesn't work correctly and no QoS control fields

Zhu Yi <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:01:05 +0800
Newsgroups gmane.linux.drivers.ipw2100.devel
Organization Intel Corp.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 16:58 +0200, Marco Talunzo wrote:
>         Vendor Specific: WME
>             Tag Number: 221 (Vendor Specific)
>             Tag length: 24
>             Tag interpretation: WME PE: type 2, subtype 1, version 1,
> parameter set 5
>             Tag interpretation: WME AC Parameters: ACI 0 (Best
> Effort), Admission Control not Mandatory, AIFSN 3, ECWmin 4, ECWmax 4,
> TXOP 0
>             Tag interpretation: WME AC Parameters: ACI 1 (Background),
> Admission Control not Mandatory, AIFSN 7, ECWmin 4, ECWmax 4, TXOP 0
>             Tag interpretation: WME AC Parameters: ACI 2 (Video),
> Admission Control not Mandatory, AIFSN 2, ECWmin 3, ECWmax 3, TXOP 94
>             Tag interpretation: WME AC Parameters: ACI 3 (Voice),
> Admission Control not Mandatory, AIFSN 2, ECWmin 2, ECWmax 2, TXOP 47

We don't support Cisco private Aironet but we do support WME. Please
attach your dmesg with debug=0x800000ff.

Thanks,
-yi


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you.  Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/