Re: Caller ID not supported?
Steve Laverty <[email protected]> Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:28:34 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.modem.hcf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Caller ID has worked flawlessly for me for your application for over a year now. The only thing I can think of is that modems need to have additional hardware to support on-hook caller ID. Perhaps your modem is not equipped. Going into minicom and typing AT+VCID=1 has always worked for me, in fact I combine that with AT+VDR=1 so that I know which 'line' the call came in on. It is worth noting that I beleive that AT+VCID=1 only produces a response when not in AT+FCLASS=8. Not sure about 1 or 1.0. To be safe try it in 0. Steve Rick Matthews wrote: >My weekend project was to bring up a network caller id sever using a >127a:1003 PCI modem from the spare parts bin and the hcfpcimodem >software (1.01lnxt04072900full_k2.4.20_28.8-1rh.i586 to be exact). > >Current status: The modem gives the proper responses during >initialization but reports only the RINGs with no cid information. > >I went back through the archives and found: > _Seven people have inquired about caller id. > _Only two of the seven received responses. > _Both were asked to run "hcfpciconfig --dumpdiag". > _Both complied and submitted their dumpdiag data. > _Neither received any additional assistance. > _One of the two then paid for the full version and re-asked > his cid question, but received no response. > >Shouldn't caller id be added to the limitations page? > >Rick >_______________________________________________ >%(real_name)s mailing list >%(real_name)s@%(host_name)s >%(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s > > > > _______________________________________________ %(real_name)s mailing list %(real_name)s@%(host_name)s %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s