Re: what the best chip for embedded
Donald Becker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.realtek.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0206191000060.1669-100000@presario> |
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, John Tully wrote: > I am planning an embedded board and would like to know what is the best of > the low-cost 10/100 Ethernet chips. PCI or another bus? > Important for consideration: > > - power usage > (this will use POE and it allows about 13 watts plus a little) You mean 1.3W right? Even that number is easy to meet. > - good linux drivers (of course) > - board realestate > (the size of the chip and how much area it requires on the board) The Realtek chips have been excellent at integration. You can't make a $6 board when you have 100+ additional components, even if they are surface mount. (Compare with some of the "modern" 3com board.) > - minimum load on CPU, as the CPU will not be so fast > (this is a low cost embedded board) This rules out everything before the C+ chip. The 'C' and previous chips required an extra copy on both transmit and receive. > - cost Realtek has always been the low-cost vendor. You might compare to NatSemi (natsemi.c), ADMtek (tulip.c) and Alta (sundance.c). 3Com and Intel are premium products and are usually higher priced. -- Donald Becker [email protected] Scyld Computing Corporation http://www.scyld.com 410 Severn Ave. Suite 210 Second Generation Beowulf Clusters Annapolis MD 21403 410-990-9993