Re: what the best chip for embedded

Donald Becker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.drivers.realtek.devel
Message-ID <Pine.LNX.4.33.0206191000060.1669-100000@presario>
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, John Tully wrote:

> I am planning an embedded board and would like to know what is the best of
> the low-cost 10/100 Ethernet chips.

PCI or another bus?

> Important for consideration:
>
> - power usage
>        (this will use POE and it allows about 13 watts plus a little)

You mean 1.3W right?  Even that number is easy to meet.

> - good linux drivers (of course)
> - board realestate
>        (the size of the chip and how much area it requires on the board)

The Realtek chips have been excellent at integration.  You can't make a
$6 board when you have 100+ additional components, even if they
are surface mount.  (Compare with some of the "modern" 3com board.)

> - minimum load on CPU, as the CPU will not be so fast
>        (this is a low cost embedded board)

This rules out everything before the C+ chip.  The 'C' and previous
chips required an extra copy on both transmit and receive.

> - cost

Realtek has always been the low-cost vendor.  You might compare to
NatSemi (natsemi.c), ADMtek (tulip.c) and Alta (sundance.c).  3Com and
Intel are premium products and are usually higher priced.

-- 
Donald Becker				[email protected]
Scyld Computing Corporation		http://www.scyld.com
410 Severn Ave. Suite 210		Second Generation Beowulf Clusters
Annapolis MD 21403			410-990-9993
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.