Re: what the best chip for embedded
John Tully <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.realtek.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sorry, PCI bus is needed. > > I am planning an embedded board and would like to know what is the best of > > the low-cost 10/100 Ethernet chips. > >PCI or another bus? > > > Important for consideration: > > > > - power usage > > (this will use POE and it allows about 13 watts plus a little) > >You mean 1.3W right? Even that number is easy to meet. > > > - good linux drivers (of course) > > - board realestate > > (the size of the chip and how much area it requires on the board) > >The Realtek chips have been excellent at integration. You can't make a >$6 board when you have 100+ additional components, even if they >are surface mount. (Compare with some of the "modern" 3com board.) > > > - minimum load on CPU, as the CPU will not be so fast > > (this is a low cost embedded board) > >This rules out everything before the C+ chip. The 'C' and previous >chips required an extra copy on both transmit and receive. > > > - cost > >Realtek has always been the low-cost vendor. You might compare to >NatSemi (natsemi.c), ADMtek (tulip.c) and Alta (sundance.c). 3Com and >Intel are premium products and are usually higher priced. > >-- >Donald Becker [email protected] >Scyld Computing Corporation http://www.scyld.com >410 Severn Ave. Suite 210 Second Generation Beowulf Clusters >Annapolis MD 21403 410-990-9993