Re: Forcing 100FD
Andrea Carpani <[email protected]> Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:24:30 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.vortex.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Critical Path |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Il giorno mer, 26-10-2005 alle 11:06 +0200, Bogdan Costescu ha scritto: > > I have a 3Com Corporation 3c905C-TX/TX-M [Tornado] (rev 78) ethernet > > controller and I'm trying to disable autonegotiation and force 100 > > FullDuplex. > Then you should probably read the archives of this list as this was a > subject very much discussed. Indeed I did: I downloaded all the messages on the list (mailman's crappy interface has no search function) and searched through it since nov 1999: a lot of people were able to use the insmod parameters, but few used the driver as builtin. There are a lot of comments about autnoeg being good and forcing bad, but I found no explanation on why. I might have missed some messages thoug. > > but forcing the media this way leads to carrier errors on the > > interface after a while. > Is the other side of the cable (switch port) also forced to 100-FD ? I'm quite sure yes, but I'll double check this. > > I've managed to boot the kernel with "3c59x.debug=3 > > 3c59x.options=0x204": this looks fine except for the weird output of > > ethtool: > When you select something else than the MII transceiver (which you do > with 0x204), this (the MII) is not initialized and reading later data > from it returns garbage. Ok, thanks. Any chance to force 100FD with command line tools? I don't seem to have carrier errors if I use the kernel parameters. -- Andrea Carpani <[email protected]> Critical Path _______________________________________________ vortex mailing list [email protected] http://www.scyld.com/mailman/listinfo/vortex