Re: build a hack box of choice?
Scott Serr <[email protected]> Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:11:21 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.wireless.access-point |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I might be narrow minded, but... hardware specifically for WiFi Linux projects. I want the hardware to be much closer in cost (and function) to a SOHO router than the general purpose stuff that in my opinion costs to much to really catch on. If an OpenBrick was $100 I would probably not be torturing you all with my dumb idea. I like at the price of the 802.11g APs and routers... Under $50 after rebates on some of these. If a company were to negotiate with Netgear/Dlink/Linksys or their OEMs for the same thing, with complete hackability... it would be well worth $100 I would think. -Scott Francois Gurin wrote: >How would such hardware differ from soekris and openbrick? > >--francois > >On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:03:36AM -0700, Scott Serr wrote: > > >>To clarify what I am thinking a little... What if XYZ company could >>supply you with hardware that is almost like the SOHO router that you >>are porting to, but XYZ company adds widget A to make it hackable. And >>they try to have a long run without EOLing so fast. >> >>Basically XYZ would obtain or build the super hackable SOHO you want, >>give it to you at a decent price and in a limited way support the >>hacking and Linux porting that you guys do. >> >>-Scott >> >> >>Bruno Lopes F. Cabral wrote: >> >> >> >>>Hello there >>> >>>there are at least a few initiatives like you're searching for, >>>i.e. from seattlewireless.net (Samsung S3C4510B), hri.sf.net >>>(Conexant 84200/newer samsungs), actiontec router, ucrouter.ru >>>(also Samsung S3C4510B) and so on >>> >>>all of them try to port linux to SOHO routers(*), which are >>>cheap but have the drawback of changed hardware revisions >>>so often that one could get a unit with a different processor >>>than the one already ported to :^| >>> >>>I'm with hri.sf.net guys: some info on porting is on-line, >>>some is published on the list (we really need to put all >>>on-line, sf.net list archive is simply horrible!)... some >>>is still undocumented ... >>> >>>our goal is to make the ports AND PUT THE INFO ON HOW WE >>>DID IT available. the boards we're tweaking into have >>>serial UARTs available, as JTAG connectors >>> >>>about books, I read one from O'reilly (Building Embedded >>>Linux I think) but it is more on how to build your own >>>toolchain(**) than on how to diggle with different hardware >>>to start with. I'm in search of a book on _hardware_ >>>and how to change linux kernel to accomodate it (in case >>>anyone knows such a book, I'd like to know) >>> >>>http://vega.soi.city.ac.uk/~es728/pdf/aleph.pdf >>>as a nice doc about how to port linux to a new ARM based >>>board. that helped me to solve the uncompressing part >>>of linux boot loader (so I get my first cx84200 port >>>with ramdisk to SMC7004VWBR rev.1 hardware) >>> >>>about a cheaper board than soekris, try www.pcengines.ch, >>>Geode 233 for US$140 (US$98 in 480 quantities). soekris >>>is about US$185-199 for a AMD ELAN 133, which seems too >>>much to me ( remember you'll need to add wlan card, >>>power supply and case -- that's why HRI project is so >>>interesting ;-) ) >>> >>>Cheers >>>!3runo >>> >>>(*) ucrouter.ru actually build their own board. their >>>rom can run on many samsung s3c4510b based boxes! >>> >>>(**) I recomend snapgear.org toolchain. it is available >>>for various embedded systems >>> >>>Scott Serr wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>With all the talk about which new box might be hackable, it seems >>>>obvious that there is a need for something cheap but with the >>>>capabilities of the expensive Soekris boards. >>>> >>>>I work as a software engineer (IT department doing mostly Java and >>>>web stuff) of an ASIC company. I know very little about hardware, >>>>but I work with friends that know hardware and know the industry and >>>>the OEM players. >>>> >>>>My question is... what needs to be in a box to not just make it >>>>hackable, but be made to hack and put Linux on it? Also, is there >>>>current hardware (WRT54?) that may have an OEM much like all the >>>>vendors that used the WL11000 based boards? >>>>I'm wondering if a rough business model of catering to the Linux-hack >>>>market would work. Of course I am counting all the applications of >>>>the hacked boxes, otherwise the quantity probably wouldn't be enough. >>>> >>>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>LinuxAP-dev mailing list >>>[email protected] >>>http://linuxAP.ksmith.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxap-dev >>> >>> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>LinuxAP-dev mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://linuxAP.ksmith.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxap-dev >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >LinuxAP-dev mailing list >[email protected] >http://linuxAP.ksmith.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxap-dev > >