Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?

"D. Joe" <[email protected]> Thu, 26 May 2016 17:35:46 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.linux.elitists
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 01:14:43AM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:

> If I had recognized it I would have ignored it

A consummation devoutly to be wished.

Also, speaking of childish, have we discussed directed replies to the poster
that Cc: the list, when a) list policy is not to use Cc: and b) we all know
we're all subscribed to the list anyway?

It seems like, if it meets list policy, it does so more through a loophole
than through respecting the spirit of the policy, especially the "[t]his
includes the poster you are replying to" part.

In any case, it's screwing up my bog-standard mutt "hit l to list-reply",
it's annoying, and I wish you to stop doing it.

-- 
Joe   On ceding power to tech companies: http://xkcd.com/1118/
man screen | grep -A1 weird
  A weird imagination is most useful to gain full advantage of
  all the features.
_______________________________________________
Do not Cc: anyone else on mail sent to this list.  The list server is set for maximum one recipient.
linux-elitists mailing list
[email protected]
http://zgp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists