Re: Re: write_sock stream errors
"Peter T. Breuer" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.enbd.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Also sprach Nikos Gkorogiannis:" > On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 16:39, Peter T. Breuer wrote: > > > slave1 enbd-server: enbd-server: server (0) set default signal handlers > > > for slave server 548 > > > slave1 enbd-server: enbd-server: server (0) set default signal handlers > > > for slave server 551 > > > > > > The client does not get any errors (at least under the IO load I'm > > > subjecting it). Here's nbdinfo: > > > > Well, maybe the protocol of having the server write the hello first is > > a bit silly :-). > > > > > It's not necessarily a show-stopper, as there are no errors generated on > > > the client, but could it be? And what do they mean? > > > > Could it be that the server is faster than the client? > > No. Both machines are exactly the same spec. Also, I noticed that it is > happening *always* (looked at the past logs and it's always there), > exactly 1 minute and 55 seconds after establishing the initial Strange. It must be a timeout. Don't know what or where. > connection between server and client, and under no I/O (well, excluding > that one block with the partition table). Ah well, I will give 2.4.32 a > go. Please do Peter