Selon "Peter T. Breuer" <[email protected]>:
Ok, incremental patch against 2.6.8.1 -> 2.6-10 applies !
I'm going to generate a clean patch for 2.6.10 and send it to you
is # diff -u -r original-kernel-10 patched-kernel-10 > linux-2.6.10.patch ?
OK for you ?
> [email protected] wrote:
> > And for enbd, do you advise me to build modules outside of the kernel
> 2.6.10, or
> > to patch it ?
>
> The enbd code is not invasive. Such real nontrivial patches as there
> are in the distributed archive are only to the kernel Makefiles and
> Kconfig files.
>
> But since I managed to figure out (with help) how to compile 2.6 enbd
> outside the kernel tree, you may as well try it.
Will try it soon...
>
> Well "figured out" is too strong. I made it work, somehow, and the
> mutant make procedure still might break if someone breathes too hard on
> the kernel makefiles, so I'd like you to try it and tell me if it still
> works.
>
> And then let me know if there is an "official" way of compiling outside
> the kernel tree!
>
> Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> ENBD mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.community.tummy.com/mailman/listinfo/enbd
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
Lycée Diderot Paris - Ce message est envoyé avec IMP -
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.