Re: problems getting started
"Scott Fagg" <[email protected]> Tue, 18 Jun 2002 08:51:54 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.failsafe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <sd0ef5ba.016@sydnws03> |
Removing /var/lib/failsafe/cdb and re-running cdbreinit and cbd-create-std-nodes (or something like that) has got things going again. As for documentation, if i can get a trivial setup going, i'll try to document the basics. Scott Fagg <[email protected]> Arup Brisbane (07) 3023 6000 >>> Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> 17/6/02 7:49:23 pm >>> On 2002-06-16T16:19:48, Scott Fagg <[email protected]> said: > show node A returns 'Machine (A) is not defined.' > > BUT > > define node A fails with 'Machine (A) exists.' No idea. Potentially your cluster is not "online" but in "Unknown" status. Why, I have no idea. > Is there some good documentation somewhere on how to get started and create > a trivial setup ? No, I don't think so; if you wanted to create one, that would be appreciated ;-) > Sun Jun 16 16:02:36.208 <cmond 18790:1024> <cmond_proc.c:97> Going to fork/exec new process "crsd -l ". > Sun Jun 16 16:02:36.209 <cmond 18790:1024> <cmond_proc.c:140> New process crsd pid 19376 > Sun Jun 16 16:02:36.209 <cmond 18790:1024> <cmond_pg.c:767> Recovery for process group cluster_control complete. > Sun Jun 16 16:02:36.545 <cmond 18790:1024> <cmond_sig.c:270> Process with pid 19376 has exited with status 11 Well, what do your crsd logfiles say? You don't give enough information I am afraid. > I'm on the verge of giving up. Is it meant to be this difficult ?! No, and it isn't I think ;-) Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Brée <[email protected]> -- Immortality is an adequate definition of high availability for me. --- Gregory F. Pfister _______________________________________________ LinuxFailSafe mailing list [email protected] http://lists.community.tummy.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxfailsafe