Re: AW: Status of FailSafe on RH7.2 with GLIBC 2.2.4

-- 
Malcolm Cowe.
IT | Technical Computing,    Telephone: +44 131 331 6466
Agilent Technologies Ltd.    Telnet: 313-3466
Malcolm Cowe wrote:
> 
> I was given the helpful advice of setting the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL
> environment variable to 2.2.5:
> 
> export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5
> 
> or
> 
> setenv LD_ASSUME_KERNEL 2.2.5
> 
> That at least allowed the java components to compile. This for the IBM
> JDK 1.1.8.
> 
> --
> Malcolm Cowe.
> IT | Technical Computing,    Telephone: +44 131 331 6466
> Agilent Technologies Ltd.    Telnet: 313-3466
> 
> Oliver Jehle wrote:
> >
> > i think, when you install another 1.1.8 jdk (sun/blackdown/ibm) working
> > with your redhat release, it should work.
> >
> > the ibm-jdk used from sgi, don't work on my suse 7.3 system. it throws
> > segsegv. so i changed the scripts to use the default shipped with suse
> > 7.3 and it works.
> >
> > i hope sgi will release soon a version of the sysadm is working with
> > java2  ... when starting the tools with it, the look&feel is better ...
> >
> > On Fri, 2002-04-19 at 08:40, Martin Bene wrote:
> > > Hi Oliver,
> > >
> > > > I've posted a patch soon, that FailSafe works with glibc
> > > > 2.2.4 ... se my
> > > > posting to kashif shaikh...
> > > >
> > > > due to problems (existing) with the cvs version on oss, there is no
> > > > official version of the patch available in the moment.
> > > >
> > > > when oss-cvs is on the lastes version, (now it's November 2001), lars
> > > > he will check the patch in with small changes...
> > > >
> > > > In the meantime, you can work with the pachtes i sent to kashif shaikh
> > > > on this list..
> > >
> > > I've been trying to get failsafe up using your patches, but I find that I'm stuck much earlier: trying to get the sysadm-base stuff compiled; looks like the required version of the java SDK doesn't work on RH 72, build process gehts stuck as soon as it hits the first javac call. (one jre process just sitting there eating 100% cpu).
> > >
> > > How did you get past this one?
> > >
> > > Thanks, Martin
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LinuxFailSafe mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.community.tummy.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxfailsafe
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxFailSafe mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.community.tummy.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxfailsafe