Re: Number of ACL-Entries
Dave Kleikamp <[email protected]> Fri, 28 Jul 2006 03:01:34 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.file-systems.acl.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I hesitated in responding because I was hoping that someone with some similar admin experience would speak up. I'll give it a shot anyway. On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 10:03 +0200, S. Klaiber wrote: > Hi Shaggy and Andreas, > > thanks for your quick and valuable answers! > I have a scenario with about 7000 users who are required to share files with > each other and arrange individual access to those files. Division of these > files in goups would be the best idea since they are expected to be > classified by projects. > > But what if there are more projects than the limit of group-assignments to a > user? I would think that if you have some class of users that you want to give access to every project, you would create a group for them, rather than adding them to every group. Maybe a small project could add individual acl entries for users, and maybe some privileged groups. A project with a larger following may create a project group and add lots of users to it. > In HP/UX 11.11 the maximum number of groups in the system was 20. In Solaris > 8 it was also 16 or 20. What is the maximum number of groups in 2.6 Linux? > And in how many groups can a user be listed? I assume that the value of > NGROUPS_MAX in the kernel sources (include/linux/limits.h, v. 2.6.9-34) > define the maximum number of groups in the system. This is currently 65536 > (/proc/sys/ngroups_max or sysctl -a). But what is the maximum number of > groups that a user can be assigned to? The kernel will allow a user to be a member of 65536 groups, but I'm not sure if glibc and other important user-space programs allow it. > Currently i am working on a concept where the files are stored in a database > and the users can define each others access by setting up ACLs within the > DBMs via a web-interface. I could also deny direct access to the files via > the file system and write a special service that has an own ACL-Management > and controls the file access. Just like ftp but with an own ACL handling. But > fs ACLs would be the best idea. I think it can be done well with acl's, but I don't have any personal experience managing anything like this. Anybody else on the list, feel free to speak up. :-) -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ acl-devel mailing list [email protected] http://acl.bestbits.at/mailman/listinfo/acl-devel