Re: [linux-cifs-client] SMB Trans Vs SMB Write / SMB Read

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 06:06:42AM -0500, Shirish Pargaonkar wrote:
> OK.  I was thinking why should named pipe concern itself
> with how a blob has arrived i.e.  either via smbtrans or
> via smbwrite?  For example, in case of QNmPipeInfo, if the
> blob can contain necessary info such as function name
> (0x26) and Infolevel (0x1), named pipe should have a
> response ready to be read.

Please ask Microsoft (and maybe in particular Chris Hertel)
about this particular isse. Unfortunately I don't have
access to Microsoft source code, so I don't really know what
the ways to these functions are.

Volker

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkq7n5gACgkQbsgDfmnSbrY6WgCfXvSIenL2GJ3+egIzof9sYNWl
aBsAoIJDmvHf3klBWkif4IwZUTntHpPP
=1voE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----