Re: [linux-cifs-client] SMB Trans Vs SMB Write / SMB Read

Alright.  I thought Samba server would have similar functionality
as far as named pipes are concerned. Thanks.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Volker Lendecke <[email protected]
> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 06:06:42AM -0500, Shirish Pargaonkar wrote:
> > OK.  I was thinking why should named pipe concern itself
> > with how a blob has arrived i.e.  either via smbtrans or
> > via smbwrite?  For example, in case of QNmPipeInfo, if the
> > blob can contain necessary info such as function name
> > (0x26) and Infolevel (0x1), named pipe should have a
> > response ready to be read.
>
> Please ask Microsoft (and maybe in particular Chris Hertel)
> about this particular isse. Unfortunately I don't have
> access to Microsoft source code, so I don't really know what
> the ways to these functions are.
>
> Volker
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkq7n5gACgkQbsgDfmnSbrY6WgCfXvSIenL2GJ3+egIzof9sYNWl
> aBsAoIJDmvHf3klBWkif4IwZUTntHpPP
> =1voE
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>