Re: [ANNOUNCE] new HFS(+) driver

Hi,

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, J.A. Magallon wrote:

> Two notes:
> - You should give a patch or at least give a notice that linux/include/hfs* have
>   to be killed (or move hfs_fs.h there).

You did apply linux-2.4.hfs.diff? I don't understand why you had to move 
hfs_fs.h, it should be picked up from the current directory.

> - I had to include linux/sched.h in hfs/sysdep.c to get the definition for
>   'current', that was neded in some subinclude of linux/smp_lock. This can be
>   caused by any other of my patches, but it doesn't hurt.

Simply move <linux/smp_lock.h> past "hfs_fs.h".

bye, Roman



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf