Re: SPEC file question
Kevin DeKorte <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.freshrpms.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 18:00 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote: > Kevin DeKorte wrote : > > > So say in my current spec file I have > > > > BuildRequires: xorg-x11-devel mozilla-devel > 1.5 gtk2-devel > 2.2.1 > > > > In FC5 this might be a different list so how can I say > > > > BuildRequires: (xorg-x11-devel or (xorg-xpm-devel and > > xorg-something-devel) and mozilla-devel > 1.5 and gtk2-devel > 2.2.1 > > > > > > Basically I want to be able to use the same spec file for FC3 thru FC5. > > > > Any ideas on this? > > Yes : > 1) Wait for the next xorg update to FC4 (and hopefully/maybe FC3 too), > which should "Provides:" all of these new libraries. > 2) Use some spec file macros like we are doing in rpmforge and in > Fedora Extras. You'll have to pass options like "--define 'dist fc4'" > or "--define 'fedora 4'" to rpmbuild, though. > > Matthias > Since I use mock to compile different versions of my package would I need the defines? Again right now my spec file works correctly for FC3 and FC4, but I just want to make sure it will work correctly for FC5 as well. So I guess I will wait and see and hopefully FC5 will make a xorg-x11-devel package or at least have a provides for us. Kevin -- Get my public GnuPG key from http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371/export?id=7574690260641978351
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDoF3jaR60qN0tF+8RAq5NAJ9V4bJYiFoliuA+qIGfsWDfRByNowCfa3AZ CYQFTH3e8PN44Qyz6M5k/vk= =a628 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----