Re: SPEC file question

Matthias Saou <thias@spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.freshrpms.user,gmane.spam.detected
Message-ID <20051214193833.045a7acb@python2>
Kevin DeKorte wrote :

> Since I use mock to compile different versions of my package would I
> need the defines? Again right now my spec file works correctly for FC3
> and FC4, but I just want to make sure it will work correctly for FC5 as
> well. So I guess I will wait and see and hopefully FC5 will make a
> xorg-x11-devel package or at least have a provides for us.

I don't think FC5 will provide any kind of xorg-x11-devel equivalent. The
libs have been split, and that's final :-/
As for using defines while building with mock, that's not possible AFAIK,
so switching to mach would be the "solution"...

I'm about to make a (heavily patched) mach 0.4.8 package available : It's
mostly to simplify all the configuration, but I've also put in some ugly
workarounds to get it to work for users with uid != 500, which is the main
problem I had run into.

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz) - Linux kernel 2.6.14-1.1644_FC4
Load : 0.35 0.24 0.23
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.