Re: SPEC file question
Matthias Saou <thias@spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.freshrpms.user,gmane.spam.detected |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20051214193833.045a7acb@python2> |
Kevin DeKorte wrote : > Since I use mock to compile different versions of my package would I > need the defines? Again right now my spec file works correctly for FC3 > and FC4, but I just want to make sure it will work correctly for FC5 as > well. So I guess I will wait and see and hopefully FC5 will make a > xorg-x11-devel package or at least have a provides for us. I don't think FC5 will provide any kind of xorg-x11-devel equivalent. The libs have been split, and that's final :-/ As for using defines while building with mock, that's not possible AFAIK, so switching to mach would be the "solution"... I'm about to make a (heavily patched) mach 0.4.8 package available : It's mostly to simplify all the configuration, but I've also put in some ugly workarounds to get it to work for users with uid != 500, which is the main problem I had run into. Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz) - Linux kernel 2.6.14-1.1644_FC4 Load : 0.35 0.24 0.23