Re: [users] Missing RPMs for FC5
Kevin DeKorte <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.freshrpms.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Lenz wrote: > > As someone who is using FC5 I'd have to agree with you. I'm finding the > desktop to be pretty buggy and unpolished. There have been well over > 100megs up updates already since it was released. Plus you've got only > freshrpms support atm (please correct me if I'm wrong). I've just about > had it with FC5 atm. :( > I'd have to disagree with you.... FC5 is working pretty well for me... So there have been some updates, since when has a Fedora release not had a bunch of updates within a couple of weeks after release. If I recall FC4 was a mess.. I stayed on FC3 for a long time after 4 was released. Things that are working well for me... my scanner, my digital camera, both of my lan printers, one is even attached via a Windows XP share and that was pretty darn painless to hook up. I have two machines the clean install one worked great, the upgrade not so great, but I kinda messed up some of it myself (way too many 3rd party repos). For the most part I find FC5 kinda boring (nothing I have to fix)... Only thing I am waiting for is some tools that are available for the x86_64 version by not the i386 version (hugin, autopano-sift etc...) Kevin - -- Get my public GnuPG key from http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371/export?id=7574690260641978351 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEMufFaR60qN0tF+8RAj7NAJ97aHgRk2D156MO0qRpig19KxI5hgCgqVeb 32uNBU316vqGAU4WFHRK9UY= =u6eI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----