Re: A few more recent ooopses on FC1

On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Dean Takemori wrote:

> Thanks for the perl-Test-Base addition, which fixes the dependency
> problem I reported a little while ago. But clearing that up revealed
> an issue with the recent 3.6 beta rar.
> 
> Apparently rarlabs links their latest rar 3.6 beta to a newer libc++ than is
> available on Fedora Core 1.
> 
> > rpm -ivh rar-3.6.0-0.1.beta2.rf.i386.rpm
> > error: Failed dependencies:
> >        libstdc++.so.6 is needed by rar-3.6.0-0.1.beta2.rf
> >        libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) is needed by rar-3.6.0-0.1.beta2.rf
> 
> or if you look at the binaries themselves ...
> 
> > ldd rar unrar
> > rar:
> >        libstdc++.so.6 => not found
> >        libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x00283000)
> >        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00591000)
> >        libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x0014c000)
> >        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00134000)
> > unrar:
> >        libstdc++.so.6 => not found
> >        libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x00283000)
> >        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00591000)
> >        libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x0014c000)
> >        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00134000)
> 
> Fortunately unrar-3.6.2-1.rf.src.rpm still builds and appears to work.
> 
> Also fortunately, rarlabs provides a rar_static in their binary tarball.
> I don't know enough .SPEC to provide a patch, but I guess the
> proper behavior is to install rar_static on older distros (RH9, FC1 etc.)
> 
> As usual, great job guys!

Are you using Fedora Legacy ? Since Fedora is out of support, we build 
agains Fedora Legacy, and I guess you should be using it as well for your 
own sake :)

Kind regards,
--   dag wieers,  [email protected],  http://dag.wieers.com/   --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]