Re: Plea for ipw3945 for F7
Dario Castellarin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.freshrpms.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Justin Conover ha scritto: > > > On 6/3/07, *Agustin Barto* <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 6/3/07, Marek Matulka <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I agree, iwl3945 doesn't work at all - it looses connection > after few > > seconds, sometimes restarting Network Manager helps, but more often > > you need to restart your machine to get it work again. I've > downloaded > > ipw3945 from atrpms.net <http://atrpms.net> but I don't like > this repository and would > > prefer to use freshrpms version `cause version from atrpms is > kernel > > specific and doesn't use dkms to install kernel module. > > > > I'd really like to see a freshrpms ipw3945 package too. One thing I > like about the atrpms release is that they used version 1.2.0 > (stable) > instead of 1.2.1 (unstable). > > > I rebuilt the freshrpms from 6 > > [justin@comatose ~]$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/jlc.repo > [jlc] > name=jlc for Fedora $releasever - $basearch - jlc > #baseurl=file:///home/justin/rpmbuild/RPMS > baseurl=http://www.justinconover.com/pub/fedora/7/RPMS > failovermethod=priority > enabled=1 > gpgcheck=0 > protect=0 > > > I did remove iwl3945 and added rmmod to /etc/rc.local to keep it out. > > /sbin/rmmod iwl3945 > Why don't you just add a "blacklist iwl3945" to /etc/modprobe.conf? It sounds like a safer option that loading then unloading iwl3945... Dario