Re: [RFC] Removing sys-kernel/vanilla-kernel
Agostino Sarubbo <[email protected]> Wed, 03 Jun 2026 09:14:47 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2443248.ECZNHGQPT7@fcf> |
On martedì 2 giugno 2026 19:04:06 Ora legale dell’Europa centrale Sam James wrote: > Is there a particular reason? In Gentoo, we've never done extensive > patching of the kernel, which we see as a feature. It's only a small set > of config options, sometimes a few backports, and maybe one or two other > small things. > > If you really want to duplicate that work, feel free, but why do you > then need a package for it? I agree with Sam here. `gentoo-sources` is not comparable to something like the RHEL kernel sources; it remains very close to the upstream kernel, with a relatively small set of Gentoo-specific patches on top. On martedì 2 giugno 2026 13:03:00 Ora legale dell’Europa centrale Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Therefore, I would suggest one of the following approaches: > > 1) Drop vanilla-sources as well. > 2) Drop vanilla-sources and add a vanilla USE flag to gentoo-sources. To reduce the maintenance effort, another option that I did not mention before would be to keep vanilla-sources only as 9999 ebuilds, one per supported upstream branch, for example 5.10.9999, 5.15.9999, and so on. This way, users could always pull the latest version of their preferred kernel branch through Portage, while significantly reducing the maintenance burden associated with version bumps.