Re: XATTR_PAX migration

On 09/09/2013 05:26 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> 
> You can use XT_PAX provided you're not running something like a 
> tinderbox, ie doing massive amounts of ebuilds.  The problem is that 
> install is being wrapped by install.py.  As a result every instance of 
> install mean invoking the python interpreter.  With lots and lots of 
> installs, this adds up to being very slow.
> 

Ok, thanks. These are all servers and installing anything is out of the
ordinary. Should I add a note about PAX_MARKINGS to the wiki, or is
there a plan to make that unnecessary (again)?