Re: XATTR_PAX migration

On 09/09/2013 07:45 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 05:26 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>>
>> You can use XT_PAX provided you're not running something like a
>> tinderbox, ie doing massive amounts of ebuilds.  The problem is that
>> install is being wrapped by install.py.  As a result every instance of
>> install mean invoking the python interpreter.  With lots and lots of
>> installs, this adds up to being very slow.
>>
>
> Ok, thanks. These are all servers and installing anything is out of the
> ordinary. Should I add a note about PAX_MARKINGS to the wiki, or is
> there a plan to make that unnecessary (again)?
>

Feel free to add any documentation you guys think is lacking.

-- 
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY 14201
(716) 829-8197