Re: Portage-related AVCs

On 23/11/16 15:58, Jason Zaman wrote:
> Either is fine, but im probably just gonna stabilize the 2.6 userspace
> in a couple weeks so that one is likely easier. and setools4 is waaay
> better than 3. The important point is that you dont want to have both
> policy.29 and policy.30 around. Then you get weirdness like if you
> downgrade a kernel or something random it'll load in the old policy
> which probably doesnt work properly, so whichever you pick, make sure
> you nuke the other one. and semodule -B will rebuild the whole policy
> again and load it.
OK - I will go with policy.30 and add the keywords etc. I did a couple 
of local policy changes that may not be needed so will they disappear in 
all of this or do I need to remove them somehow first?

Thanks for all your help,
Robert