Re: Portage-related AVCs

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 04:59:03PM +0000, Robert Sharp wrote:
> 
> On 23/11/16 15:58, Jason Zaman wrote:
> > Either is fine, but im probably just gonna stabilize the 2.6 userspace
> > in a couple weeks so that one is likely easier. and setools4 is waaay
> > better than 3. The important point is that you dont want to have both
> > policy.29 and policy.30 around. Then you get weirdness like if you
> > downgrade a kernel or something random it'll load in the old policy
> > which probably doesnt work properly, so whichever you pick, make sure
> > you nuke the other one. and semodule -B will rebuild the whole policy
> > again and load it.
> OK - I will go with policy.30 and add the keywords etc. I did a couple 
> of local policy changes that may not be needed so will they disappear in 
> all of this or do I need to remove them somehow first?

If they are in the module store tho, then it should just work without
needing to reinsert. Ie, if its in /var/lib/selinux/strict/...
If you have local changes tho, I'd just rebuild them and semodule -i them
again just in case, it cant hurt.

-- Jason