Re: New class diagram and use case
Nathaniel McCallum <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.installer |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 17:03, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > I find an after-the-fact interference idea to be quite unnatural. Another > option would be to feed the backend two xml files which basically have null > actions such that they complement eachoter. Such a solution however would be > suboptimal to me I don't understand why this is unnatural. Could you develop a case scenario what would warrant the pausing? Personally, I would prefer hooks for user defined scripts (between stages). Nathaniel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAIB3QZqtfQECNMsoRAn2iAKCGADxksNnysjDbugh/ajFO1IRUjACfZ2sO Rfj7Hmp1rgPU0jwgsSM44po= =3+ZM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----