Re: New class diagram and use case

On Wednesday 04 February 2004 00:16, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 17:03, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > I find an after-the-fact interference idea to be quite unnatural. Another
> > option would be to feed the backend two xml files which basically have
> > null actions such that they complement eachoter. Such a solution however
> > would be suboptimal to me
>
> I don't understand why this is unnatural.  Could you develop a case
> scenario what would warrant the pausing?  Personally, I would prefer
> hooks for user defined scripts (between stages).

That would enable powerful customization of the process while leaving the 
execution unattended (no pauses). However it doesn't fill the need for 
optional pausing between steps, because not everything can be done in a 
script. In particular, a user might want to look at what the installer's done 
and act on it.

-- 
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Matan, Israel
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD  0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAIB8dUI2RQ41fiVERAk56AJ963+AJZXDfxUVMnx+oiqekOWfmuwCghL5r
sWTz9b0yAV/bKX1mzsqgLuo=
=2C8B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----